Difference between revisions of "Meeting 1 November 2019"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
ACTION ITEMS: | ACTION ITEMS: | ||
| − | * (David H., Sean, Tanja) Finalize CPS article - target for submission: 22 November | + | * (David H., Sean, Rolf, Donal, Tanja, ...) Finalize CPS article - target for submission: 22 November |
::* implement comments from Sean and Donal | ::* implement comments from Sean and Donal | ||
::* check figure captions | ::* check figure captions | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::* author list | ::* author list | ||
| − | * Simulations in preparation for NSF MRI | + | * (Gabriel) Simulations in preparation for NSF MRI |
::* need radiation analysis on coil to determine what isolation material to use - for specific simulation specs see item 4a from 10/11 meeting (need one z-value) | ::* need radiation analysis on coil to determine what isolation material to use - for specific simulation specs see item 4a from 10/11 meeting (need one z-value) | ||
::* need some phi angles to see how much shielding to use - also item 4a | ::* need some phi angles to see how much shielding to use - also item 4a | ||
| − | * Funding proposal | + | * (David H., Tanja) Funding proposal |
::* prepare an itemized budget for discussion | ::* prepare an itemized budget for discussion | ||
::* prepare 1-2 page on CPS for David H funding proposal submission | ::* prepare 1-2 page on CPS for David H funding proposal submission | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
DETAILS OF THE DISCUSSION | DETAILS OF THE DISCUSSION | ||
| + | |||
| + | * CPS simulation update - step 0 is complete! | ||
| + | ::* Comparison of Parker Reid to Gabriel Niculescu simulations - they are consistent | ||
| + | ::* details of the simulations: | ||
| + | ::::* both based on cylindrical geometry | ||
| + | ::::* horizontal axis is the beam direction | ||
| + | ::::* vertical axis is transverse to beam direction AND integrated over all phi angles | ||
| + | ::* should still figure out what the events in the indicated box are - strange since no material there | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * Discussion about next steps for simulation | ||
| + | ::* Insert intermediate steps before step 1 to determine material needed for CPS and cost estimate for funding proposal | ||
| + | ::::* complete step 4a for one z-value, factor 3 sufficient - choice of material | ||
| + | ::::* need phi angles bins - amount of shielding, radiation going into floor etc. | ||
| + | ::* step 1 involves comparison to an Hall C experiment, e.g. J/Psi, to verify activation after 1000 hours running etc. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * Discussion about beam size in Hall D | ||
| + | ::* 10% radiator - take half the size (5%) and assume 11-12 GeV in Hall D - results in 2.5cm RMS after 80m | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * Discussion about CPS article | ||
| + | ::* Comments from Donal coming | ||
| + | ::* David H. will implement comments from Sean, Donal, and check figure captions | ||
| + | ::* Additional authors - Sean will check with Justin on authorship | ||
| + | ::::* Add some text on Hall D | ||
| + | ::* Try to submit by 11/22 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * Discussion about funding proposal | ||
| + | ::* budget elementary: magnet and diagnostics | ||
| + | ::* require estimate for simulation step 4a, e.g., some phi values to see how much shielding to use and for radiation analysis of magnet coils and iteration with vendor | ||
| + | ::* assume JLab provides: support structure, cooling, safety for high radiation, beam line and beam line diagnostics | ||
| + | ::* David H. preparing UK funding proposal - include 1-2 pages on CPS; due date is end of November | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * CPS collaboration meeting - plan for 3 February or 4 February 2020 | ||
| + | ::* need to check agenda for NPS collaboration meeting (3 Feb 2020) | ||
| + | ::* no obvious conflicts for either day | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | NEXT CPS PHONE MEETINGS: | ||
| + | * FRIDAY 15 NOVEMBER AT 11:00AM (ET) | ||
| + | * FRIDAY 22 NOVEMBER AT 11:00AM (ET) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:06, 1 November 2019
DISCUSSION MATERIAL
ACTION ITEMS:
- (David H., Sean, Rolf, Donal, Tanja, ...) Finalize CPS article - target for submission: 22 November
- implement comments from Sean and Donal
- check figure captions
- add more detail on Hall D - Sean will send some text
- author list
- (Gabriel) Simulations in preparation for NSF MRI
- need radiation analysis on coil to determine what isolation material to use - for specific simulation specs see item 4a from 10/11 meeting (need one z-value)
- need some phi angles to see how much shielding to use - also item 4a
- (David H., Tanja) Funding proposal
- prepare an itemized budget for discussion
- prepare 1-2 page on CPS for David H funding proposal submission
- CPS collaboration meeting - determine date based on NPS agenda
DETAILS OF THE DISCUSSION
- CPS simulation update - step 0 is complete!
- Comparison of Parker Reid to Gabriel Niculescu simulations - they are consistent
- details of the simulations:
- both based on cylindrical geometry
- horizontal axis is the beam direction
- vertical axis is transverse to beam direction AND integrated over all phi angles
- should still figure out what the events in the indicated box are - strange since no material there
- Discussion about next steps for simulation
- Insert intermediate steps before step 1 to determine material needed for CPS and cost estimate for funding proposal
- complete step 4a for one z-value, factor 3 sufficient - choice of material
- need phi angles bins - amount of shielding, radiation going into floor etc.
- step 1 involves comparison to an Hall C experiment, e.g. J/Psi, to verify activation after 1000 hours running etc.
- Discussion about beam size in Hall D
- 10% radiator - take half the size (5%) and assume 11-12 GeV in Hall D - results in 2.5cm RMS after 80m
- Discussion about CPS article
- Comments from Donal coming
- David H. will implement comments from Sean, Donal, and check figure captions
- Additional authors - Sean will check with Justin on authorship
- Add some text on Hall D
- Try to submit by 11/22
- Discussion about funding proposal
- budget elementary: magnet and diagnostics
- require estimate for simulation step 4a, e.g., some phi values to see how much shielding to use and for radiation analysis of magnet coils and iteration with vendor
- assume JLab provides: support structure, cooling, safety for high radiation, beam line and beam line diagnostics
- David H. preparing UK funding proposal - include 1-2 pages on CPS; due date is end of November
- CPS collaboration meeting - plan for 3 February or 4 February 2020
- need to check agenda for NPS collaboration meeting (3 Feb 2020)
- no obvious conflicts for either day
NEXT CPS PHONE MEETINGS:
- FRIDAY 15 NOVEMBER AT 11:00AM (ET)
- FRIDAY 22 NOVEMBER AT 11:00AM (ET)