Meeting 31 July 2020

From Cuawiki
Revision as of 13:42, 31 July 2020 by Hornt (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

DISCUSSION TOPICS:

  • Shielding and magnet model
  • Hall A/C model and design/implementation
  • Hall D design and radiation simulations
  • Other


PARTICIPANTS: Amy Comer, Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Gabriel Niculescu, David Hamilton, Donal Day, Vladimir Berdnikov, Hovanes Egiyan, Rolf Ent, Sean Dobbs, Josh Crafts, Tanja Horn, Hamlet Mkrtchyan, Steven Lassiter, Marie Boer, Igor Strakovsky,


SUMMARY NOTES

SIMULATIONS (Gabriel)

  • Power deposition in central CPS
  • total power 30kW
  • fraction of power ~1kW/cm
  • Core flared - but small at entrance and then flares out due to energy spread, deflection
  • gap largest at downstream end
  • ACTION: update model to match simulation


MECHANICAL MODELING/DESIGN (Josh, Steve L.)

  • Beam pipe channel design: need specs for diameter, flare (Bogan can provide) - assumed in model rectangular shape
  • part the flares out in Gabriel model consists of two cones (bigger one is ~12cm)
  • easiest may be circular and diameter ~4" - best only one flange
  • Downstream beam pipe 4" diameter seems to work well
  • ACTION: Offline discussion about beam pipe material, cooling, dimensions
  • Note: no cooling needed for pipe
  • Magnet cooling - how to introduce cooling into the shield
  • labyrinth not needed as particles of low energy and bending down, opening 1cm and length 30cm then ratio 30
  • best to make connections upstream - through back with lower entry, bigger hole in back should not be a problem
  • cooling for 30kW beam, but also need cooling and power for magnet itself
  • main worry is activation - best might be straight from back (upstream!) for power
  • ACTION: implement cooling channels
  • Cu Core machining
  • Compound corners - best may be a few mm
  • ACTION: edit core model, pole for beam pipe at rear exit (diameter cabling, beam pipe, etc.)


TUNGSTEN POWDER (Bogdan)

  • Not yet ordered - still in procurement
  • ACTION: investigate order status
  • Involve B. Metzger in discussion about tungsten powder - prior experience with W mixtures
  • investigate possibility to order lower density powder and R&D to make suitable blocks
  • high density powder became expensive


LEAD PROCUREMENT (Bogdan)

  • In the works - should arrive in ~ 2months
  • May be too much to store in Pb storage area - investigation ongoing


NEXT MEETING: FRIDAY 28 AUGUST AT 11:00 AM (ET)