Difference between revisions of "Meeting 4 June 2019"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "'''ACTION ITEMS''' * Article ::* (Tanja, Rolf, David H.) Make a rough draft using the MSRI pre-proposal and David's cleaned up tech document ::* (All) Assign sections for eve...") |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
* Discussion of CPS article | * Discussion of CPS article | ||
::* Should be highest priority to get this out | ::* Should be highest priority to get this out | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Discussion of plans for TCS conditionally approved proposal | ||
| + | ::* No update at the upcoming PAC, but a new LOI (different topic) will be submitted | ||
Revision as of 10:41, 5 June 2019
ACTION ITEMS
- Article
- (Tanja, Rolf, David H.) Make a rough draft using the MSRI pre-proposal and David's cleaned up tech document
- (All) Assign sections for everyone to edit
- (Bogdan, Gabriel) CPS model for optimizations and porting to Hall D
- Could be based on Parker's FLUKA studies
- Should be simple to modify and easy to run - GEANT4 might be best
- (All) CPS cost review - split out pieces that could be of interest to different funding sources
- (Rolf, Bogdan, Tanja) Start with spreadsheet from MSRI
Discussion Details
- Discussion path forward for CPS
- CPS main components: 1) magnet+insert, 2) "nominal" shielding
- Funding strategy: review and split out logical pieces and check for items that might give the impression that they are replacing "aging JLab equipment"
- Need to investigate details of Track 1/Track 2 MRI
- Discussion CPS modeling
- Earlier studies done by Parker (FLUKA), Gabriel (GEANT4), Jixie
- Best would be a simple to modify and to run application - GEANT4?
- Discussion of CPS article
- Should be highest priority to get this out
- Discussion of plans for TCS conditionally approved proposal
- No update at the upcoming PAC, but a new LOI (different topic) will be submitted