# Difference between revisions of "Simulation Tasks - collection"

From Cuawiki

(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

− | * Implement EEEMCal ('''contact: Carlos''') | + | * Implement EEEMCal ('''contact: [mailto:munoz@jlab.org Carlos]''') |

− | * Implement barrel homogeneous EMCal ('''contact: Nathaly''') | + | * Implement barrel homogeneous EMCal ('''contact: [mailto:nathaly@mit.edu Nathaly]''') |

* Compare different reconstruction algorithms | * Compare different reconstruction algorithms | ||

− | * Investigate discrimination between single photon and merged photons from pi0 decay based on cluster tower energy distribution; same for e/pi separation - possibly explore machine learning application ('''contact: Renee''') | + | * Investigate discrimination between single photon and merged photons from pi0 decay based on cluster tower energy distribution; same for e/pi separation - possibly explore machine learning application ('''contact: [mailto:renee.fatemi@uky.edu Renee]''') |

* Hybrid calorimeter clustering | * Hybrid calorimeter clustering | ||

Line 12: | Line 12: | ||

* Light transport going beyond summing up GEANT4 hits | * Light transport going beyond summing up GEANT4 hits | ||

− | * Determine impact of calorimeter support structure on physics performance; define module geometry ('''contact: Vardan, Arthur''') | + | * Determine impact of calorimeter support structure on physics performance; define module geometry ('''contact: [mailto:tadevosn@jlab.org Vardan], Arthur''') |

::* study/conclude on the tolerance for the size of the gaps between modules (defined by the alveolar and other support elements); also for the transition region between two calorimeters. | ::* study/conclude on the tolerance for the size of the gaps between modules (defined by the alveolar and other support elements); also for the transition region between two calorimeters. | ||

* Angular (rapidity) dependencies: for non-projective geometry for modules with the same length, the EMCal depth seen by the particle will depend on rapidity (with 45 degrees to the beam line it will be a factor of sqrt(2) larger compared to 0 degree). We know that e/h separation will be affected (shower profile), but simple E/p matching performance for eID may be affected too (deeper EMCal - more probability for charged hadron to shower); also the affect of gaps will be different with the angle. | * Angular (rapidity) dependencies: for non-projective geometry for modules with the same length, the EMCal depth seen by the particle will depend on rapidity (with 45 degrees to the beam line it will be a factor of sqrt(2) larger compared to 0 degree). We know that e/h separation will be affected (shower profile), but simple E/p matching performance for eID may be affected too (deeper EMCal - more probability for charged hadron to shower); also the affect of gaps will be different with the angle. | ||

− | * Comparison of simulation with test beam data (electrons, pions, etc) and find the ways for simulation tuning (e.g. light transport model and/or non-uniformity map, etc.) - '''contacts: Petr,''' | + | * Comparison of simulation with test beam data (electrons, pions, etc) and find the ways for simulation tuning (e.g. light transport model and/or non-uniformity map, etc.) - '''contacts: [mailto:petrs@jlab.org Petr],''' |

− | * Detector Design Optimization ('''contact: Cristiano''') | + | * Detector Design Optimization ('''contact: [mailto:cfanelli@mit.edu Cristiano]''') |

* ... | * ... |

## Latest revision as of 10:45, 17 May 2021

- Implement EEEMCal (
**contact: Carlos**)

- Implement barrel homogeneous EMCal (
**contact: Nathaly**)

- Compare different reconstruction algorithms

- Investigate discrimination between single photon and merged photons from pi0 decay based on cluster tower energy distribution; same for e/pi separation - possibly explore machine learning application (
**contact: Renee**)

- Hybrid calorimeter clustering

- see JLab HyCal

- Light transport going beyond summing up GEANT4 hits

- Determine impact of calorimeter support structure on physics performance; define module geometry (
**contact: Vardan, Arthur**)

- study/conclude on the tolerance for the size of the gaps between modules (defined by the alveolar and other support elements); also for the transition region between two calorimeters.

- Angular (rapidity) dependencies: for non-projective geometry for modules with the same length, the EMCal depth seen by the particle will depend on rapidity (with 45 degrees to the beam line it will be a factor of sqrt(2) larger compared to 0 degree). We know that e/h separation will be affected (shower profile), but simple E/p matching performance for eID may be affected too (deeper EMCal - more probability for charged hadron to shower); also the affect of gaps will be different with the angle.

- Comparison of simulation with test beam data (electrons, pions, etc) and find the ways for simulation tuning (e.g. light transport model and/or non-uniformity map, etc.) -
**contacts: Petr,**

- Detector Design Optimization (
**contact: Cristiano**)

- ...