Difference between revisions of "KLF beamline meeting - May 29, 2024"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (42 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*; Progress of CPS design (Tim, Pavel) | *; Progress of CPS design (Tim, Pavel) | ||
| + | **; [[media:CPS Z Positions.pdf | CPS Beamline layout]] | ||
| + | **; Tim: | ||
| + | - prototype of absorber - next two months | ||
| + | - finalization of shielding in terms of installation and deinstallation | ||
| + | - magnet and absorber design is nearly finalized (99% ready) | ||
| + | - reduced dose allow to operate with cheap resin | ||
| − | *; New design, construction, and installation schedule estimates (Tim) | + | **; [[media:K0LmtgMay29.pdf | CPS Model Update – May 2024, “KLCPS80”]] |
| + | **; Pavel: | ||
| + | - updated model of CPS. Main motivation to accommodate technical requirements, like all joints outside shielding | ||
| + | - new model reduces dose on magnet coils. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *; New design, construction, and installation schedule estimates (Tim) | ||
| + | **; [[media:KLONG_2026instl_No_MRI.pdf | KLONG Installation Schedule 2026 with no MRI Magnet]] | ||
| + | **; [[media:KLONG_2025instl_MRI_v2.pdf | KLONG Installation Schedule 2025 with MRI Magnet]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | - 2025 is feasible, but would require additional manpower to parallelize operations. | ||
| + | - 2026 is rather relaxed. | ||
| + | - Budget profile is on the way. | ||
| + | - Answer to a question from Igor: an early pre-installation of CPS is not possible due to conflict in location with existing equipment. | ||
*; Space at the lab (Tim, Eugene) | *; Space at the lab (Tim, Eugene) | ||
| + | **; Need 700 sq ft general indoor storage on or off site | ||
| + | **; 200 sq ft in ESB (KFM detector check out) | ||
| + | **; Additional 150 sq ft in lead shed | ||
| + | **; Assume MRI magnet comes directly to hall when available | ||
| + | - Space is requested from the lab, no problem with allocations are expected | ||
*; Recommendation #4 from ERR-1 (Moskov) | *; Recommendation #4 from ERR-1 (Moskov) | ||
*: Results of the studies | *: Results of the studies | ||
| − | *: Statement regarding the studies of KLF compatibility with MOLLER | + | *: Statement regarding the studies of KLF compatibility with MOLLER. |
| + | *: '''On May 24, Moskov reported that accelerator folks did not have a time to check a situation with Moeller vs KLF in May and will do that in November.''' | ||
| − | *; Recommendation #5 from ERR-1 | + | *; Recommendation #5 from ERR-1 (Tim) |
*: Results of the studies | *: Results of the studies | ||
*: Statement regarding thermal cycling of the targets receiving >1 KW power. | *: Statement regarding thermal cycling of the targets receiving >1 KW power. | ||
| + | - Thermal cycling (Tim): | ||
| + | - All seems to be good | ||
| + | |||
| + | *; Any other business. | ||
| + | **; '''Mikhail reported a tentative schedule for the KFM parts to be moved from Juelich to JLab.''' | ||
| + | - Expected deinstallation - beginning of August. | ||
| + | - Possible contribution from Juelich for equipment transfer. | ||
| + | - Possible additional funding for tracker electronics | ||
| + | - Without a magnet two layers are sufficient -> reduction of channels # by factor of 2 -> 122*4*2~1000 channels. | ||
| + | - '''Eugene's comment''': TDC from Hall-B might be available and sufficient for this. (will be explored). | ||
| + | **; '''On the next meeting, Ilya will report the KL rate from Be-target extracted from PRimex measurements.''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Minutes = | ||
| + | '''Present''': Mikhail, Tim, Edy, Pavel, Eugene, Marshall, Hovanes, Eduard, Vitaly, Beni, P.D., Igor | ||
| − | + | ---- | |
Latest revision as of 15:28, 31 May 2024
Agenda
- Announcements
- Progress of CPS design (Tim, Pavel)
- prototype of absorber - next two months - finalization of shielding in terms of installation and deinstallation - magnet and absorber design is nearly finalized (99% ready) - reduced dose allow to operate with cheap resin
- updated model of CPS. Main motivation to accommodate technical requirements, like all joints outside shielding - new model reduces dose on magnet coils.
- New design, construction, and installation schedule estimates (Tim)
- 2025 is feasible, but would require additional manpower to parallelize operations. - 2026 is rather relaxed. - Budget profile is on the way. - Answer to a question from Igor: an early pre-installation of CPS is not possible due to conflict in location with existing equipment.
- Space at the lab (Tim, Eugene)
- Need 700 sq ft general indoor storage on or off site
- 200 sq ft in ESB (KFM detector check out)
- Additional 150 sq ft in lead shed
- Assume MRI magnet comes directly to hall when available
- Space is requested from the lab, no problem with allocations are expected
- Recommendation #4 from ERR-1 (Moskov)
- Results of the studies
- Statement regarding the studies of KLF compatibility with MOLLER.
- On May 24, Moskov reported that accelerator folks did not have a time to check a situation with Moeller vs KLF in May and will do that in November.
- Recommendation #5 from ERR-1 (Tim)
- Results of the studies
- Statement regarding thermal cycling of the targets receiving >1 KW power.
- Thermal cycling (Tim): - All seems to be good
- Any other business.
- Mikhail reported a tentative schedule for the KFM parts to be moved from Juelich to JLab.
- Expected deinstallation - beginning of August. - Possible contribution from Juelich for equipment transfer. - Possible additional funding for tracker electronics - Without a magnet two layers are sufficient -> reduction of channels # by factor of 2 -> 122*4*2~1000 channels. - Eugene's comment: TDC from Hall-B might be available and sufficient for this. (will be explored).
- On the next meeting, Ilya will report the KL rate from Be-target extracted from PRimex measurements.
Minutes
Present: Mikhail, Tim, Edy, Pavel, Eugene, Marshall, Hovanes, Eduard, Vitaly, Beni, P.D., Igor