Difference between revisions of "May 25th, 2021"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* The transition fluence for void swelling in irradiated pure copper is the issue as ''Bogdan'' pointed out. First of all, thank you, ''Pavel'', for sending us a nice overview [https://wiki.jlab.org/klproject/images/0/0c/Zinkle90.pdf]. Actually, the main source of the problem is (n, alpha) and (n,t) reactions and the bottom line is to prevent a transition fluence for void swelling in irradiated pure copper, we have to (1) keep the temperature of our Cu radiator below 200°C (2) use Cu with 2%Be and/or 3.5%Ti. | * The transition fluence for void swelling in irradiated pure copper is the issue as ''Bogdan'' pointed out. First of all, thank you, ''Pavel'', for sending us a nice overview [https://wiki.jlab.org/klproject/images/0/0c/Zinkle90.pdf]. Actually, the main source of the problem is (n, alpha) and (n,t) reactions and the bottom line is to prevent a transition fluence for void swelling in irradiated pure copper, we have to (1) keep the temperature of our Cu radiator below 200°C (2) use Cu with 2%Be and/or 3.5%Ti. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Let us have a new KLF Collaboration meeting in September. | ||
Revision as of 06:50, 25 May 2021
Attended: Moskov, Sean. Justin, Mikhail, Jim, Hovanes, Eugene, Pavel, and Igor.
- The transition fluence for void swelling in irradiated pure copper is the issue as Bogdan pointed out. First of all, thank you, Pavel, for sending us a nice overview [1]. Actually, the main source of the problem is (n, alpha) and (n,t) reactions and the bottom line is to prevent a transition fluence for void swelling in irradiated pure copper, we have to (1) keep the temperature of our Cu radiator below 200°C (2) use Cu with 2%Be and/or 3.5%Ti.
- Let us have a new KLF Collaboration meeting in September.