Difference between revisions of "April 26th, 2017"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| − | * Avetik and Giessen group have here experience with Philips dSiPM [https://wiki.jlab.org/klproject/images/4/46/Avetik-Heidelberg-nachopenoffice.pdf], Ketek SiPM (now), and Orsay SAMPIC type of signal measurements. Also a few MCP-PMT | + | * Avetik and Giessen group have here experience with Philips dSiPM [https://wiki.jlab.org/klproject/images/4/46/Avetik-Heidelberg-nachopenoffice.pdf], Ketek SiPM (now), and Orsay SAMPIC type of signal measurements. Also a few MCP-PMT from Hamamatsu, Photonis, and Budker institute might be available. All he can test on prototypes. |
| − | from Hamamatsu,Photonis and | + | |
* Schedule for the PAC45 submission: | * Schedule for the PAC45 submission: | ||
Revision as of 11:07, 24 April 2017
Tentative Agenda [...]
- The recent draft of the KLF proposal [...].
- Avetik and Giessen group have here experience with Philips dSiPM [1], Ketek SiPM (now), and Orsay SAMPIC type of signal measurements. Also a few MCP-PMT from Hamamatsu, Photonis, and Budker institute might be available. All he can test on prototypes.
- Schedule for the PAC45 submission:
- May 1: Draft of the proposal will be posted internally to the GlueX Collaboration for discussion.
- May 15-17: We have to have a short presentation at the GlueX Collaboration meeting.
- May 22: Deadline to submit our KLF proposal to PAC45.