Difference between revisions of "January 4th, 2017"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Agenda: | |
| − | 1) | + | 1) Event generators: |
| − | 2) | + | Nick: |
| + | |||
| + | Franz: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | 2) MC News (Mikhail) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Justin: From the meeting today it seems that you would like a new calibration context in CCDB for the klong simulations which seems quite reasonable. I would suggest we collect a list of settings you need specified for your simulation and then we can request these under a new context called "mc_klong". So the two tables I'm aware of that you need modified are | ||
| + | |||
| + | rf_period = 64 | ||
| + | beam_period = 64 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Simon, what magnetic field did you use in your studies https://www.jlab.org/conferences/kl2016/talks/tuesday/taylor.pdf? It might be useful to try something near our nominal field like 1200 A (solenoid_1200A_poisson_20160222) and a lower field setting of maybe 800 A (solenoid_0800A_poisson_20160222). | ||
| + | |||
| + | There is a mapping in the solenoid_map table which specifies a magnetic field setting for a given run number. So we should choose 2 different run numbers and assign these 2 field settings for them so you can generate events which will have different fields. | ||
3) n-calculations (Igor) | 3) n-calculations (Igor) | ||
Revision as of 13:26, 4 January 2017
Agenda:
1) Event generators:
Nick:
Franz:
2) MC News (Mikhail)
Justin: From the meeting today it seems that you would like a new calibration context in CCDB for the klong simulations which seems quite reasonable. I would suggest we collect a list of settings you need specified for your simulation and then we can request these under a new context called "mc_klong". So the two tables I'm aware of that you need modified are
rf_period = 64 beam_period = 64
Simon, what magnetic field did you use in your studies https://www.jlab.org/conferences/kl2016/talks/tuesday/taylor.pdf? It might be useful to try something near our nominal field like 1200 A (solenoid_1200A_poisson_20160222) and a lower field setting of maybe 800 A (solenoid_0800A_poisson_20160222).
There is a mapping in the solenoid_map table which specifies a magnetic field setting for a given run number. So we should choose 2 different run numbers and assign these 2 field settings for them so you can generate events which will have different fields.
3) n-calculations (Igor)
4) Meson spectroscopy (Volker, Lei)
5) etc.