Difference between revisions of "February 7th, 2018"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* KL beam: Ilja made MC for KL beam and he promised to provide a geometrical profile (size and angle) of KL beam on the cryotarget. The size of the KL beam is much broader than the size of the diameter of the cryotarget. | * KL beam: Ilja made MC for KL beam and he promised to provide a geometrical profile (size and angle) of KL beam on the cryotarget. The size of the KL beam is much broader than the size of the diameter of the cryotarget. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Final design of Be-target assembly [https://wiki.jlab.org/klproject/images/9/97/Be1.pdf] | ||
Revision as of 19:25, 5 February 2018
- Attended:
- Just a reminder: We will have PKI2018 Workshop, Feb 14-15 [1]
- KL Flux Monitor: Mikhail sent KL Flux Memo to Eugene [2]
- CFS: Tanja posted a draft of the NPS/CPS 2018 Action Items: [3].
- Sc & cryotarget: A week ago, Justin, Eric, Chris, and Igor met and discuss a SC and LH2/LD2 cryotarget configuration. The bottom line is that the cryotarget will have 6 cm in diameter and 40 cm length and it will fit a SC scattering chamber. The cryotarget location is in the center of the GlueX detector.There is a minor question regarding a production angle for different particles for different reactions which somehow depends on the cryotarget location.
- KL beam: Ilja made MC for KL beam and he promised to provide a geometrical profile (size and angle) of KL beam on the cryotarget. The size of the KL beam is much broader than the size of the diameter of the cryotarget.
- Final design of Be-target assembly [4]