Difference between revisions of "March 29th, 2019"

From kl project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Attended:  
+
Attended: Moskov, Mikhail, Jim, Sean, Justin, and Igor
  
 
Following the message from Curtis on the PAC schedule
 
Following the message from Curtis on the PAC schedule
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* Move unnecessary sections to appendices to condense the material for the reviewers.
 
* Move unnecessary sections to appendices to condense the material for the reviewers.
  
GlueX White Paper [https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0038/003870/006/gluex_future.pdf].
+
GlueX White Paper [https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0038/003870/011/gluex_future.pdf].
  
 
Tentative agenda of our meeting:
 
Tentative agenda of our meeting:
  
- Status of revised proposal
+
- The GlueX Collaboration endorsement issue.
  
-
+
- Status of revised proposal.
 +
 
 +
- Our next meeting.

Latest revision as of 16:10, 29 March 2019

Attended: Moskov, Mikhail, Jim, Sean, Justin, and Igor

Following the message from Curtis on the PAC schedule

  • Timeline for PAC47 approval within GlueX
    • April 1: Proposal proponents request an internal review for endorsement
    • April 8: Draft proposal submitted to internal review committee with charge from CB
    • May 15: Internal review committee responds to charge, then CB and EG decide if proposal will be put up for a vote (at Collaboration Meeting)
    • May 27: Initiate vote for proposal endorsement (2 weeks for vote)
    • June 10: PAC47 proposal deadline

For the April 8th deadline we plan to address the comments from the previous (PAC46) report:

  • Effects of systematic uncertainties on our results
  • Lack of awareness of competition in the international community, and impact this has on scheduling
  • The proponents should describe the physics impact (for example, how will new baryon states test lattice QCD?), including effects of systematic errors on partial wave analyses.
  • Demonstrate that systematic errors are under control, given the very small systematic errors expected, including energy resolution and acceptance at low -t.
  • Move unnecessary sections to appendices to condense the material for the reviewers.

GlueX White Paper [1].

Tentative agenda of our meeting:

- The GlueX Collaboration endorsement issue.

- Status of revised proposal.

- Our next meeting.