Difference between revisions of "January 18th, 2017"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
1) MC simulations: | 1) MC simulations: | ||
| − | Franz regards it someone will do the simulations for the KL project: they only have to replace the standard beamline geometry definition in hdds/prod/BeamLine_HDDS.xml with the attached modified file (of course, the original file Beamline_HDDS.xml should be saved first). | + | * Franz regards it someone will do the simulations for the KL project: they only have to replace the standard beamline geometry definition in hdds/prod/BeamLine_HDDS.xml with the attached modified file (of course, the original file Beamline_HDDS.xml should be saved first). |
| − | + | * Mikhail: KLp-->K+n: there are some technical issues with magnetic field. | |
| − | + | * Nick: KLp -> pi+ Sigma0: there are some technical issues with magnetic field. | |
| − | + | * Franz: KLp -> pi+ Lambda | |
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
4) There are some tasks which are good to list in the proposal while our focus is hyperon spectroscopy: | 4) There are some tasks which are good to list in the proposal while our focus is hyperon spectroscopy: | ||
| − | Volker: [http://hadron.physics.fsu.edu/~crede/FILES/KL-Meeting-Jan-2017.pdf Meson spectroscopy]. | + | * Volker: [http://hadron.physics.fsu.edu/~crede/FILES/KL-Meeting-Jan-2017.pdf Meson spectroscopy]. |
Igor: We have to check what SuperLEAR and PANDA planed to do. | Igor: We have to check what SuperLEAR and PANDA planed to do. | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| − | Moskov: CP violation. | + | * Moskov: CP violation. |
| − | TBD: LD2-target experiments. | + | * TBD: LD2-target experiments. |
| − | TBD: Polarized H and D target experiments. | + | * TBD: Polarized H and D target experiments. |
| − | TBD: Hypernuclei. | + | * TBD: Hypernuclei. |
| − | TBD: KL-nuclei interaction. | + | * TBD: KL-nuclei interaction. |
| − | TBD: Hadrons in nuclear medium. | + | * TBD: Hadrons in nuclear medium. |
| − | TBD: Possibility to have a neutron beam. | + | * TBD: Possibility to have a neutron beam. |
| − | TBD: Possibility to have charged kaon beams. | + | * TBD: Possibility to have charged kaon beams. |
Latest revision as of 16:05, 22 January 2017
Agenda [attended: Mikhail, Mark, Volker, Nick, Simon, and Igor] :
1) MC simulations:
- Franz regards it someone will do the simulations for the KL project: they only have to replace the standard beamline geometry definition in hdds/prod/BeamLine_HDDS.xml with the attached modified file (of course, the original file Beamline_HDDS.xml should be saved first).
- Mikhail: KLp-->K+n: there are some technical issues with magnetic field.
- Nick: KLp -> pi+ Sigma0: there are some technical issues with magnetic field.
- Franz: KLp -> pi+ Lambda
2) HIPS2017 Workshop is coming in February 6th-7th which ACU will host
[1].
3) Preparation for PAC45 [2]: schedule and what-to-do
Igor/Volker: We have to make a case for the GlueX Collaboration. Meeting is scheduled on February 16th - 18th
4) There are some tasks which are good to list in the proposal while our focus is hyperon spectroscopy:
- Volker: Meson spectroscopy.
Igor: We have to check what SuperLEAR and PANDA planed to do.
Mikhail: We have to check what COMPAS plan to do.
- Moskov: CP violation.
- TBD: LD2-target experiments.
- TBD: Polarized H and D target experiments.
- TBD: Hypernuclei.
- TBD: KL-nuclei interaction.
- TBD: Hadrons in nuclear medium.
- TBD: Possibility to have a neutron beam.
- TBD: Possibility to have charged kaon beams.
5) What JLab plan to move our KL-project on?
Volker: On the recent Board of director, Bob MeKoewn said that he expects a special session addressed to the KL project.
Igor: Bob MeKoewn called for briefing on February 13th. So, we will know a JLab administration plan for our KL project.
6) Recent KEK Workshop: [3] where Igor made a presentation for the KL project