Difference between revisions of "CPS meeting - May 6, 2022"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
* First we discussed where CPS could potentially located. The consensus was that it should be in-between the tagger magnet and the permanent magnet in the tagger hall . | * First we discussed where CPS could potentially located. The consensus was that it should be in-between the tagger magnet and the permanent magnet in the tagger hall . | ||
| − | * Vitaly considered a few examples of magnets that could be used for CPS with different length. | + | * Vitaly considered a few examples of magnets that could be used for CPS with different length: 75cm, 145, 300cm. |
| + | * The energy depositions did not show much improvement and the length of the 300cm magnet was much larger than the spread. | ||
* Pavel, Eugene and Hovanes pointed out that the most important issue for choosing or designing the magnet is the heat deposition spread. | * Pavel, Eugene and Hovanes pointed out that the most important issue for choosing or designing the magnet is the heat deposition spread. | ||
Revision as of 18:05, 19 May 2022
Agenda
- Announcements
- Minutes from previous meetings
- Optimal photon beam angle (Eugene, Moskov)
- Simulation updates (Vitaly)
- Other items
Minutes
Present: Hovanes, Igor, Eugene, Vitaly, Sean, Tim, Pavel, Moskov
Announcements
- Igor told us that the registration for the KLF meeting is open: Registration page
Items from previous meetings
- Eugene looked at the problem of the optimal angle of the photon beam but does not have plots to show yet. He will send some plots after the meeting.
- Vitaly identified that the high does rate before the CPS is due to the radiator.
Simulation updates
- First we discussed where CPS could potentially located. The consensus was that it should be in-between the tagger magnet and the permanent magnet in the tagger hall .
- Vitaly considered a few examples of magnets that could be used for CPS with different length: 75cm, 145, 300cm.
- The energy depositions did not show much improvement and the length of the 300cm magnet was much larger than the spread.
- Pavel, Eugene and Hovanes pointed out that the most important issue for choosing or designing the magnet is the heat deposition spread.
Action items
- Angle of photon beam with respect to the nominal beam line (Eugene, Moskov)
- Simulations of the dose rate without the radiator (Vitaly)
- Determine a data format for the energy deposition file used for temperature calculations .
- Hovanes will talk to Bogdan regarding the magnet choice.
Instructions for joining
Join ZoomGov Meeting https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1608547409?pwd=bWhpZG1yWVk1TWlEb3BjUW9DdmVLZz09 Meeting ID: 160 854 7409 Passcode: 454278 One tap mobile +16692545252,,1608547409# US (San Jose) +16468287666,,1608547409# US (New York)