Difference between revisions of "November 19th, 2024"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<b>Attended</b>: <!--''Sean'', ''Moskov'', ''Vitaly'', ''Marshall'', ''Mikhail'', ''Eugene'', ''Richard'', ''Zhihong'', ''Stuart'', ''Hovanes'', and ''Sashi''. --> * Announce...") |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/17GFPgQ0YyD6vYy7_Xw8KcNHSIaXiqJqL/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=102465777344247357279&rtpof=true&sd=true KLF Software Task List]. | * [https://docs.google.com/document/d/17GFPgQ0YyD6vYy7_Xw8KcNHSIaXiqJqL/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=102465777344247357279&rtpof=true&sd=true KLF Software Task List]. | ||
* Talks | * Talks | ||
| + | |||
| + | <b>Notes</b> | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Had some discussion about Vitaly's and Sashi's analyses. Sean pointed out that they were probably not using the right ReactionFilter options, will help dig into this. | ||
| + | * Extensive discussion on validating photoproduction cross section expectations from PYTHIA. Richard showed some results from phi production at RadPhi, which had large errors, but agreed with Eugene's calculations on the roughly 20% level. Came to the conclusion that it should be possible to check the p+Ks photoproduction cross section at GlueX. Sean has some code that can be adapted to look into this, and offered to do so. | ||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 21 November 2024
Attended:
- Announcements
Notes
- Had some discussion about Vitaly's and Sashi's analyses. Sean pointed out that they were probably not using the right ReactionFilter options, will help dig into this.
- Extensive discussion on validating photoproduction cross section expectations from PYTHIA. Richard showed some results from phi production at RadPhi, which had large errors, but agreed with Eugene's calculations on the roughly 20% level. Came to the conclusion that it should be possible to check the p+Ks photoproduction cross section at GlueX. Sean has some code that can be adapted to look into this, and offered to do so.