Difference between revisions of "March 29th, 2019"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Attended: | Attended: | ||
| − | Following Curtis the schedule | + | Following the message from Curtis on the PAC schedule |
| − | + | * Timeline for PAC47 approval within GlueX | |
| − | April 1: Proposal proponents request an internal review for endorsement | + | ** April 1: Proposal proponents request an internal review for endorsement |
| − | + | ** April 8: Draft proposal submitted to internal review committee with charge from CB | |
| − | April 8: Draft proposal submitted to internal review committee with charge from CB | + | ** May 15: Internal review committee responds to charge, then CB and EG decide if proposal will be put up for a vote (at Collaboration Meeting) |
| − | + | ** May 27: Initiate vote for proposal endorsement (2 weeks for vote) | |
| − | May 15: Internal review committee responds to charge, then CB and EG decide if proposal will be put up for a vote (at Collaboration Meeting) | + | ** June 10: PAC47 proposal deadline |
| − | |||
| − | May 27: Initiate vote for proposal endorsement (2 weeks for vote) | ||
| − | |||
| − | June 10: PAC47 proposal deadline | ||
| + | For the April 8th deadline we plan to address the comments from the previous (PAC46) report: | ||
| + | * Effects of systematic uncertainties on our results | ||
| + | * Lack of awareness of competition in the international community, and impact this has on scheduling | ||
| + | * The proponents should describe the physics impact (for example, how will new baryon states test lattice QCD?), including effects of systematic errors on partial wave analyses. | ||
| + | * Demonstrate that systematic errors are under control, given the very small systematic errors expected, including energy resolution and acceptance at low -t. | ||
| + | * Move unnecessary sections to appendices to condense the material for the reviewers. | ||
GlueX White Paper [https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0038/003870/006/gluex_future.pdf]. | GlueX White Paper [https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0038/003870/006/gluex_future.pdf]. | ||
| − | |||
Tentative agenda of our meeting: | Tentative agenda of our meeting: | ||
Revision as of 08:42, 25 March 2019
Attended:
Following the message from Curtis on the PAC schedule
- Timeline for PAC47 approval within GlueX
- April 1: Proposal proponents request an internal review for endorsement
- April 8: Draft proposal submitted to internal review committee with charge from CB
- May 15: Internal review committee responds to charge, then CB and EG decide if proposal will be put up for a vote (at Collaboration Meeting)
- May 27: Initiate vote for proposal endorsement (2 weeks for vote)
- June 10: PAC47 proposal deadline
For the April 8th deadline we plan to address the comments from the previous (PAC46) report:
- Effects of systematic uncertainties on our results
- Lack of awareness of competition in the international community, and impact this has on scheduling
- The proponents should describe the physics impact (for example, how will new baryon states test lattice QCD?), including effects of systematic errors on partial wave analyses.
- Demonstrate that systematic errors are under control, given the very small systematic errors expected, including energy resolution and acceptance at low -t.
- Move unnecessary sections to appendices to condense the material for the reviewers.
GlueX White Paper [1].
Tentative agenda of our meeting:
- Status of revised proposal
-