Difference between revisions of "Targets"

From Xem2
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
==ERR Planning==
 +
[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VNpQ8GqdOkiyhPmecokpZJ--6wYiSZlt-lF-irs8rqE/edit?usp=sharing Target Google Sheet]
 +
 +
==Information stuffs==
 +
 +
[http://www.jlab.org/Hall-C/talks/08_15_13/covrig.pdf Silviu's Hall C talk]  Includes a proposal for a new target system (that may or may not be built).  Yes, there's more room for solid targets, but because there's no loop 3 (Meekins already said that's a way to add more targets).
 +
 +
==Food for Thought and to help us make decisions==
 
<b>PRIMARY PHYSICS TOPICS:</b>
 
<b>PRIMARY PHYSICS TOPICS:</b>
  
Line 119: Line 127:
 
| 1, 3
 
| 1, 3
 
|  
 
|  
 +
|-
 +
|- bgcolor="#FA5882"
 +
! scope="row"| Argon-40
 +
| 40
 +
| 18
 +
| dunno
 +
| 1, 2
 +
| Isospin scan #3 [n/p>1]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|- bgcolor="#58FA58"
 
|- bgcolor="#58FA58"
Line 227: Line 243:
 
[[File:Np_ratios.png|n/p ratios vs A]]
 
[[File:Np_ratios.png|n/p ratios vs A]]
 
[[File:Np_ratios_density.png|n/p ratios vs density]]
 
[[File:Np_ratios_density.png|n/p ratios vs density]]
 +
[[File:densities.png|densities world set (> 700 isotopes)]]
 +
[[File:znp.png| N/P  versus Z world set (> 700 isotopes)]]
 +
[[File:Nuclei.png| Z versus N world set (> 700 isotopes)]]

Latest revision as of 16:02, 18 April 2017

Here's a list of included (either in x>1 or EMC) targets (greenish) and possible new targets (reddish).

     Included                Wanted          
         

ERR Planning

Target Google Sheet

Information stuffs

Silviu's Hall C talk Includes a proposal for a new target system (that may or may not be built). Yes, there's more room for solid targets, but because there's no loop 3 (Meekins already said that's a way to add more targets).

Food for Thought and to help us make decisions

PRIMARY PHYSICS TOPICS:

0) 2 <= A <= 12 - Extract EMC effect and SRCs for nuclei where detailed ab initio calculations can be performed - Examine nuclei with significant cluster structure - Use nuclei which differ by single proton(neutron) to extract contribution of 'smeared' nucleon to F2A


1) 2 <= A <= 96, |n/p-1|<20% [11 nuclei] - A-dependence over maximal range in A with minimal isoscalar correction


2) A ~ 50, 1 <= n/p <= 1.4 [6 nuclei] - Map out variation with n/p with minimal A-dependence


3) 12 <= A <= 232, n/p grows as ln(A) from 1 to 1.6


Target A Z Max I Physics program [see above] Other properties
Hydrogen 1 1 dunno Calibration
Deuterium 2 1 dunno 0, 1
Helium-3 3 2 dunno 0
Helium-4 4 2 dunno 0, 1
Lithium-6 6 3 dunno 0, 1, 3 Isospin scan #1 [n/p=1]
Lithium-7 3 7 dunno 0, 3 Isospin scan #1 [n/p~1.3]
Beryllium 9 0, 4 dunno 3 Greatest clustering effects
Boron-10 10 5 dunno 0, 1, 3 Isospin scan #2 [n/p=1]
Boron-11 11 5 dunno 0, 3 Isospin scan #2 [n/p~1.2]
Carbon-12 12 6 dunno 0, 1, 3 Calibration, reference
Aluminum 27 13 40uA 1, 3
Argon-40 40 18 dunno 1, 2 Isospin scan #3 [n/p>1]
Calcium-40 40 20 dunno 1, 2 Isospin scan #3 [n/p=1]
Calcium-48 48 20 dunno 2 Isospin scan #3 [n/p~1.4]
Titanium-48 48 22 80 uA 1, 2, 3 Isospin scan #3 [n/p~1.2]
Nickel-58 58 28 80uA 1, 2
Nickel-64 64 28 80uA 2, 3
Copper-Nat 63 29 80uA 1, 2, 3
Ruthenium-96 96 44 80uA 1 Isospin scan #4 [n/p~1.2]
Ruthenium-104 104 44 80uA 3 Isospin scan #4 [n/p~1.4]
Silver-107 107 47 dunno 3 Isospin scan #4 [n/p~1.3]
Tin-120 120 50 35uA 3 (and NMC data is weird) Isospin scan #4 [n/p~1.4]
Gold-197 197 79 80uA 3
Thorium-232 232 90 80uA 3 Extreme n/p, distorted nucleus (long vs short range correlations)
Uranium-238 238 92 10uA 3 Extreme n/p, NOT distorted

n/p ratios vs A n/p ratios vs density densities world set (> 700 isotopes) N/P versus Z world set (> 700 isotopes) Z versus N world set (> 700 isotopes)