Difference between revisions of "Targets"
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | ==ERR Planning== | ||
+ | [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VNpQ8GqdOkiyhPmecokpZJ--6wYiSZlt-lF-irs8rqE/edit?usp=sharing Target Google Sheet] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Information stuffs== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-C/talks/08_15_13/covrig.pdf Silviu's Hall C talk] Includes a proposal for a new target system (that may or may not be built). Yes, there's more room for solid targets, but because there's no loop 3 (Meekins already said that's a way to add more targets). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Food for Thought and to help us make decisions== | ||
<b>PRIMARY PHYSICS TOPICS:</b> | <b>PRIMARY PHYSICS TOPICS:</b> | ||
Line 119: | Line 127: | ||
| 1, 3 | | 1, 3 | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- bgcolor="#FA5882" | ||
+ | ! scope="row"| Argon-40 | ||
+ | | 40 | ||
+ | | 18 | ||
+ | | dunno | ||
+ | | 1, 2 | ||
+ | | Isospin scan #3 [n/p>1] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- bgcolor="#58FA58" | |- bgcolor="#58FA58" | ||
Line 228: | Line 244: | ||
[[File:Np_ratios_density.png|n/p ratios vs density]] | [[File:Np_ratios_density.png|n/p ratios vs density]] | ||
[[File:densities.png|densities world set (> 700 isotopes)]] | [[File:densities.png|densities world set (> 700 isotopes)]] | ||
− | [[File: | + | [[File:znp.png| N/P versus Z world set (> 700 isotopes)]] |
+ | [[File:Nuclei.png| Z versus N world set (> 700 isotopes)]] |
Latest revision as of 16:02, 18 April 2017
Here's a list of included (either in x>1 or EMC) targets (greenish) and possible new targets (reddish).
Included | Wanted | ||||
ERR Planning
Information stuffs
Silviu's Hall C talk Includes a proposal for a new target system (that may or may not be built). Yes, there's more room for solid targets, but because there's no loop 3 (Meekins already said that's a way to add more targets).
Food for Thought and to help us make decisions
PRIMARY PHYSICS TOPICS:
0) 2 <= A <= 12 - Extract EMC effect and SRCs for nuclei where detailed ab initio calculations can be performed - Examine nuclei with significant cluster structure - Use nuclei which differ by single proton(neutron) to extract contribution of 'smeared' nucleon to F2A
1) 2 <= A <= 96, |n/p-1|<20% [11 nuclei] - A-dependence over maximal range in A with minimal isoscalar correction
2) A ~ 50, 1 <= n/p <= 1.4 [6 nuclei] - Map out variation with n/p with minimal A-dependence
3) 12 <= A <= 232, n/p grows as ln(A) from 1 to 1.6
Target | A | Z | Max I | Physics program [see above] | Other properties |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hydrogen | 1 | 1 | dunno | Calibration | |
Deuterium | 2 | 1 | dunno | 0, 1 | |
Helium-3 | 3 | 2 | dunno | 0 | |
Helium-4 | 4 | 2 | dunno | 0, 1 | |
Lithium-6 | 6 | 3 | dunno | 0, 1, 3 | Isospin scan #1 [n/p=1] |
Lithium-7 | 3 | 7 | dunno | 0, 3 | Isospin scan #1 [n/p~1.3] |
Beryllium | 9 | 0, 4 | dunno | 3 | Greatest clustering effects |
Boron-10 | 10 | 5 | dunno | 0, 1, 3 | Isospin scan #2 [n/p=1] |
Boron-11 | 11 | 5 | dunno | 0, 3 | Isospin scan #2 [n/p~1.2] |
Carbon-12 | 12 | 6 | dunno | 0, 1, 3 | Calibration, reference |
Aluminum | 27 | 13 | 40uA | 1, 3 | |
Argon-40 | 40 | 18 | dunno | 1, 2 | Isospin scan #3 [n/p>1] |
Calcium-40 | 40 | 20 | dunno | 1, 2 | Isospin scan #3 [n/p=1] |
Calcium-48 | 48 | 20 | dunno | 2 | Isospin scan #3 [n/p~1.4] |
Titanium-48 | 48 | 22 | 80 uA | 1, 2, 3 | Isospin scan #3 [n/p~1.2] |
Nickel-58 | 58 | 28 | 80uA | 1, 2 | |
Nickel-64 | 64 | 28 | 80uA | 2, 3 | |
Copper-Nat | 63 | 29 | 80uA | 1, 2, 3 | |
Ruthenium-96 | 96 | 44 | 80uA | 1 | Isospin scan #4 [n/p~1.2] |
Ruthenium-104 | 104 | 44 | 80uA | 3 | Isospin scan #4 [n/p~1.4] |
Silver-107 | 107 | 47 | dunno | 3 | Isospin scan #4 [n/p~1.3] |
Tin-120 | 120 | 50 | 35uA | 3 (and NMC data is weird) | Isospin scan #4 [n/p~1.4] |
Gold-197 | 197 | 79 | 80uA | 3 | |
Thorium-232 | 232 | 90 | 80uA | 3 | Extreme n/p, distorted nucleus (long vs short range correlations) |
Uranium-238 | 238 | 92 | 10uA | 3 | Extreme n/p, NOT distorted |