02/16/16 Meeting Analysis Follow-Up

From Ciswikidb
Jump to: navigation, search


Removing Thickest Foils

Fits of Run II data, "dilution"-subtracted, energy cut from -0.5 to +2 sigma, with thickest foils removed in sequence. Thickness data is from 1/22/16 and does not reflect newest FESEM thickness uncertainties presented 2/16/16. They, however, should not affect the fits dramatically.

Pade forms (0,1), red, former best fit; (2,0), blue, and (1,1), green are included. Note that from 2/16/16 presentation by Marty, the simulation-motivated best fit is the Pade (1,1), green on the plots, of the form

A(t) = (A0 + b * t) / (1 + c * t)

Run2.allFoils.gif all foils

Run2.no 1000nmFoil.gif no 1000 nm

Run2.no 1000 870nmFoil.gif no 1000 and 870 nm

Run2.no 1000 870 750nmFoil.gif no 1000, 870, 750 nm

Run2.no 1000 870 750 625nmFoil.gif no 1000, 870, 750, 625 nm

Run2.no 1000 870 750 625 500nmFoil.gif no 1000, 870, 750, 625 and 500 nm

Half-Sigma Energy Slices -- Fit Parameters' Dependency

Half-sigma energy slices from -4 to +4 sigma looking at fit parameters A0, b, c from form

A(t) = (A0 + b * t) / (1 + c * t)

using Run II data and 2/16/16 FESEM thickness data. This data is not "dilution"-subtracted, as I have not done a half-sigma energy slice study for "dilution"-subtracted data from either Run.

Pade11.HalfSigmaSlices.jpeg

Text Document with table media:Run2.Pade11.FitParameters.HalfSigmaSlices.odt

Pade11.A 0.Plot.gif

Pade11.b.Plot.gif

Pade11.c.Plot.gif

All data, including asymmetry by half-sigma bin for every individual foil, the above plots and data, in a spreadsheet media:Pade11.HalfSigmaSlices.AllData.ods


Best Cuts and Simulation Driven Fit

Run2 M0.5P2 dilution.gif Run 2, E-cut [-0.5:2] sigma, dilution subtracted

Run2 M1P3 dilution.gif Run 2, E-cut [-1:3] sigma, dilution subtracted

Run1 M0.5P2 dilution.gif Run 1, E-cut [-0.5:2] sigma, dilution subtracted

Run1 M1P3 dilution.gif Run 1, E-cut [-1:3] sigma, dilution subtracted