Difference between revisions of "Kerr - June 30, 2016"

From Ciswikidb
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
I also graphed a normalized version of minimum approaching data set. However, I am concerned that both of these shapes are not able to fit to our standard &Delta; p = A*sin<sup>2</sup> &theta;
 
I also graphed a normalized version of minimum approaching data set. However, I am concerned that both of these shapes are not able to fit to our standard &Delta; p = A*sin<sup>2</sup> &theta;
  
After a few attempts to fit with excel, I was unsuccessful. I may have to utilize Extrema or Canopy with Python.          
+
After a few attempts to fit with excel, I was unsuccessful. I may have to utilize Extrema or Canopy with Python.  
 +
       
 
Check it out here -->> [[media:LRappminfit.xlsx]]
 
Check it out here -->> [[media:LRappminfit.xlsx]]

Revision as of 21:41, 30 June 2016

In this graph the measured powers at the left and right of the minimum are in relation to a arbitrary rotation with 0 being perfect perpindicular interception of the polarizers.
This relationship will be important down the road for further Kerr effect calculations. The fit at this time is not completely accurate, I plan to touch it up when a presentation is closer or when I have some down time.

I also graphed a normalized version of minimum approaching data set. However, I am concerned that both of these shapes are not able to fit to our standard Δ p = A*sin2 θ

After a few attempts to fit with excel, I was unsuccessful. I may have to utilize Extrema or Canopy with Python.

Check it out here -->> media:LRappminfit.xlsx