Difference between revisions of "Jan 05 2024"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Updates from last meeting action items== | ==Updates from last meeting action items== | ||
| − | * Gabriel: Working with Max, they benchmarked the CST model with POISSON in term of electric field distributions. | + | * Gabriel: Working with Max, they benchmarked the CST model with POISSON in term of electric field distributions. [[Media:R30-4_Puck_and_Pierce.pptx]] |
* Alicia | * Alicia | ||
* Max: Evaluated cathode geometry ([[media:Gun status end of 2023.pdf|Max's summary document]]) | * Max: Evaluated cathode geometry ([[media:Gun status end of 2023.pdf|Max's summary document]]) | ||
Revision as of 13:39, 10 January 2024
Updates from last meeting action items
- Gabriel: Working with Max, they benchmarked the CST model with POISSON in term of electric field distributions. Media:R30-4_Puck_and_Pierce.pptx
- Alicia
- Max: Evaluated cathode geometry (Max's summary document)
- Carlos
Items for discussion
- Modeling
- Parameter space
Action items for next meeting
- Define electrode hole size. We chose Tee electrode diameter = 12.82 mm (0.5047 inches). The wafer is 15x15 mm. Joe said to choose the present R28-2 CEBAF gun electrode hole diameter. DONE
- Max. Study focal length and spherical aberrations using field variations
- Max and Gabriel (who is making the table?) Generate a table of parameter searches that includes: GaaAs plane position wrt to the electrode hole plane, Angle of GaAs plane, laser size, laser position, bunch charge.
- Gabriel to work with Keith on finding the GaAs position range
- Carlos to create wiki page (in progress)