Difference between revisions of "02/16/16 Meeting Analysis Follow-Up"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
1. Fits of Run II data, with thickest foils removed in sequence. Pade forms (0,1), red, former best fit; (2,0), blue, and (1,1), green are included. Note that from today's presentation by Marty, the simulation-motivated best fit is the Pade (1,1), green on the plots, of the form | 1. Fits of Run II data, with thickest foils removed in sequence. Pade forms (0,1), red, former best fit; (2,0), blue, and (1,1), green are included. Note that from today's presentation by Marty, the simulation-motivated best fit is the Pade (1,1), green on the plots, of the form | ||
| − | + | A(t) = (A_0 + b * t) / (1 + c * t) | |
2. Half-sigma energy slices from -4 to +4 sigma looking at fit parameters A_0, b, c from form | 2. Half-sigma energy slices from -4 to +4 sigma looking at fit parameters A_0, b, c from form | ||
| − | + | A(t) = (A_0 + b * t) / (1 + c * t). | |
Revision as of 18:21, 16 February 2016
1. Fits of Run II data, with thickest foils removed in sequence. Pade forms (0,1), red, former best fit; (2,0), blue, and (1,1), green are included. Note that from today's presentation by Marty, the simulation-motivated best fit is the Pade (1,1), green on the plots, of the form
A(t) = (A_0 + b * t) / (1 + c * t)
2. Half-sigma energy slices from -4 to +4 sigma looking at fit parameters A_0, b, c from form
A(t) = (A_0 + b * t) / (1 + c * t).