Difference between revisions of "02/16/16 Meeting Analysis Follow-Up"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
= ''' Half-Sigma Energy Slices -- Fit Parameters' Dependency ''' = | = ''' Half-Sigma Energy Slices -- Fit Parameters' Dependency ''' = | ||
| − | Half-sigma energy slices from -4 to +4 sigma looking at fit parameters | + | Half-sigma energy slices from -4 to +4 sigma looking at fit parameters A<sub>0<\sub>, b, c from form |
| − | A(t) = ( | + | A(t) = (A<sub>0<\sub> + b * t) / (1 + c * t) |
| + | |||
| + | using Run II data and 2/16/16 FESEM thickness data. | ||
Revision as of 18:39, 16 February 2016
Removing Thickest Foils
Fits of Run II data, with thickest foils removed in sequence. Thickness data is from 1/22/16 and does not reflect newest FESEM thickness uncertainties presented 2/16/16. They, however, should not affect the fits dramatically.
Pade forms (0,1), red, former best fit; (2,0), blue, and (1,1), green are included. Note that from 2/16/16 presentation by Marty, the simulation-motivated best fit is the Pade (1,1), green on the plots, of the form
A(t) = (A0 + b * t) / (1 + c * t)
Half-Sigma Energy Slices -- Fit Parameters' Dependency
Half-sigma energy slices from -4 to +4 sigma looking at fit parameters A0<\sub>, b, c from form
A(t) = (A0<\sub> + b * t) / (1 + c * t)
using Run II data and 2/16/16 FESEM thickness data.