Difference between revisions of "02/16/16 Meeting Analysis Follow-Up"
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
using Run II data and 2/16/16 FESEM thickness data. | using Run II data and 2/16/16 FESEM thickness data. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[file:Pade11.HalfSigmaSlices.jpeg||800px|]] | ||
| + | Text Document with table [[media:Run2.Pade11.FitParameters.HalfSigmaSlices.odt]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[file:Pade11.A_0.Plot.gif||600px|]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[file:Pade11.b.Plot.gif||600px|]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[file:Pade11.c.Plot.gif||600px|]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | All data, including asymmetry by half-sigma bin for every individual foil, the above plots and data, in a spreadsheet | ||
| + | [[media:Pade11.HalfSigmaSlices.AllData.ods]] | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 16 February 2016
Removing Thickest Foils
Fits of Run II data, with thickest foils removed in sequence. Thickness data is from 1/22/16 and does not reflect newest FESEM thickness uncertainties presented 2/16/16. They, however, should not affect the fits dramatically.
Pade forms (0,1), red, former best fit; (2,0), blue, and (1,1), green are included. Note that from 2/16/16 presentation by Marty, the simulation-motivated best fit is the Pade (1,1), green on the plots, of the form
A(t) = (A0 + b * t) / (1 + c * t)
Half-Sigma Energy Slices -- Fit Parameters' Dependency
Half-sigma energy slices from -4 to +4 sigma looking at fit parameters A0, b, c from form
A(t) = (A0 + b * t) / (1 + c * t)
using Run II data and 2/16/16 FESEM thickness data.
Text Document with table media:Run2.Pade11.FitParameters.HalfSigmaSlices.odt
All data, including asymmetry by half-sigma bin for every individual foil, the above plots and data, in a spreadsheet media:Pade11.HalfSigmaSlices.AllData.ods