Difference between revisions of "Kerr - June 10, 2016"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*At 0 degrees, naturally the measurement of power looked much like when the laser was turned off (11 nanoWatts). | *At 0 degrees, naturally the measurement of power looked much like when the laser was turned off (11 nanoWatts). | ||
*I used ND 2 | *I used ND 2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[media:opticsexp1.xlsx]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *I will perform this experiment again on Monday with a more controlled and accurate measurement system. | ||
| + | *Afterwards, I plan to fit the data to show the relationship more clearly | ||
| + | *Random note..In later diagnostic designs, another power meter and laser splitter will be used in order to better understand the power of the laser. | ||
| + | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Today I also found some useful information regarding our Iron Alloys | Today I also found some useful information regarding our Iron Alloys | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[media:Saturationironalloys.pdf]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:50, 11 June 2016
Today I graphed the first set of data taken with the optics set up.
- From a 90 degree polarization (vertical), I decreased the angle by 5 with the rotary polarizer and took the corresponding power measurement.
- At 0 degrees, naturally the measurement of power looked much like when the laser was turned off (11 nanoWatts).
- I used ND 2
- I will perform this experiment again on Monday with a more controlled and accurate measurement system.
- Afterwards, I plan to fit the data to show the relationship more clearly
- Random note..In later diagnostic designs, another power meter and laser splitter will be used in order to better understand the power of the laser.
Today I also found some useful information regarding our Iron Alloys