Difference between revisions of "Kerr - June 16, 2016"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*** I repeated the above | *** I repeated the above | ||
*** with Analyzer set vertically (maximum amount of light coming through), starting from 0 increased # of magnets to 4 | *** with Analyzer set vertically (maximum amount of light coming through), starting from 0 increased # of magnets to 4 | ||
| − | *** I | + | *** I repeated the above |
*** I then went from 4 to 0 to 4 again measuring power and also the power during magnet transition where there were no magnets on the iris | *** I then went from 4 to 0 to 4 again measuring power and also the power during magnet transition where there were no magnets on the iris | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[media:Magnet2new.xlsx]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:33, 17 June 2016
- I continued working on aligning the laser in order to perform an ideal magnet experiment
- I placed the iron foil in between an iris and an iris holder
- I placed the magnet to the back of the iris (this still was around 1 mm away)
- I then performed a few experiments
- no magnets 360 degree rotation of analyzer with foil reflection; 4 magnets behind the foil with 360 degree rotation of analyzer
- I repeated the above
- with Analyzer set vertically (maximum amount of light coming through), starting from 0 increased # of magnets to 4
- I repeated the above
- I then went from 4 to 0 to 4 again measuring power and also the power during magnet transition where there were no magnets on the iris