Difference between revisions of "02/16/16 Meeting Analysis Follow-Up"

From Ciswikidb
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
= ''' Removing Thickest Foils ''' =
 
= ''' Removing Thickest Foils ''' =
  
Fits of Run II data, with thickest foils removed in sequence. Pade forms (0,1), red, former best fit; (2,0), blue, and (1,1), green are included. Note that from today's presentation by Marty, the simulation-motivated best fit is the Pade (1,1), green on the plots, of the form  
+
Fits of Run II data, with thickest foils removed in sequence. Thickness data is from 1/22/16 and does not reflect newest FESEM thickness uncertainties presented 2/16/16. They, however, should not affect the fits dramatically.
 +
 
 +
Pade forms (0,1), red, former best fit; (2,0), blue, and (1,1), green are included. Note that from 2/16/16 presentation by Marty, the simulation-motivated best fit is the Pade (1,1), green on the plots, of the form  
 
    
 
    
A(t) = (A_0 + b * t) / (1 + c * t)
+
A(t) = #frac{A_{0} + b * t}{1 + c * t}
  
 
[[file:Run2.allFoils.gif||500px|]]
 
[[file:Run2.allFoils.gif||500px|]]

Revision as of 19:36, 16 February 2016


Removing Thickest Foils

Fits of Run II data, with thickest foils removed in sequence. Thickness data is from 1/22/16 and does not reflect newest FESEM thickness uncertainties presented 2/16/16. They, however, should not affect the fits dramatically.

Pade forms (0,1), red, former best fit; (2,0), blue, and (1,1), green are included. Note that from 2/16/16 presentation by Marty, the simulation-motivated best fit is the Pade (1,1), green on the plots, of the form

A(t) = #frac{A_{0} + b * t}{1 + c * t}

Run2.allFoils.gif

Run2.no 1000nmFoil.gif

Run2.no 1000 870nmFoil.gif

Run2.no 1000 870 750nmFoil.gif

Run2.no 1000 870 750 625nmFoil.gif

Run2.no 1000 870 750 625 500nmFoil.gif

Half-Sigma Energy Slices -- Fit Parameters' Dependency

Half-sigma energy slices from -4 to +4 sigma looking at fit parameters A_0, b, c from form

A(t) = (A_0 + b * t) / (1 + c * t).