Difference between revisions of "UITF Meeting - pre-run0 to do list"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Buncher Commissioning | Buncher Commissioning | ||
− | #Beam to 200 keV spectrometer, find zero crossing and gradient | + | #Beam to 200 keV spectrometer, find the two zero crossing phases, find crest and calibrate energy gain versus buncher gradient |
− | #Beam to MeV spectrometer, verify zero crossing | + | #Beam to MeV spectrometer, verify zero crossing (is this step of any real value?) |
− | # | + | #Measure bunchlength with Brock cavity, versus buncher gradient, find minimum and then scale graient to set minimum at two-cell |
Optic studies | Optic studies | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Yao cavity time of flight system | Yao cavity time of flight system | ||
#Work with Rama to see if it works | #Work with Rama to see if it works | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Chopper commissioning | Chopper commissioning |
Latest revision as of 15:22, 23 January 2020
UITF pre-run0 commissioning steps (1/23/2020):
Hot checkout with beam and admin steps associated with commissioning plan
- Finish sending 200 keV beam to both waist height dumps, identify all the components that don’t work and get them fixed
- Call RadCon and SSG and coordinate shielding and BLM calibration (step 6 of commissioning plan)
Buncher Commissioning
- Beam to 200 keV spectrometer, find the two zero crossing phases, find crest and calibrate energy gain versus buncher gradient
- Beam to MeV spectrometer, verify zero crossing (is this step of any real value?)
- Measure bunchlength with Brock cavity, versus buncher gradient, find minimum and then scale graient to set minimum at two-cell
Optic studies
- Harp scans, measure spot sizes and compare to Elegant predictions
- Measure beam emittance
- Dipole calibration? We know it’s 200 keV beam
- Measure energy spread
Yao cavity time of flight system
- Work with Rama to see if it works
Chopper commissioning