Difference between revisions of "Meeting 16 September 2022"

From Cuawiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Discussion items: * Design models, stress/thermal calculations * Engineering analysis and planning * TCS updates * Other")
 
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
* Other
 
* Other
 +
 +
 +
PARTICIPANTS: Amy Comer, Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Brannon Semp, Donal Day, Deb Biswas, Hamlet Mkrtchyan, Hovanes Egiyan, Steven Lassiter, Marie Boer, Rolf Ent, Vardan Tadevosyan, Yeranuhi Ghandilyan, Tanja Horn
 +
 +
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
 +
 +
* PR sent out for magnet steel, coil, etc.
 +
 +
* Prototype
 +
::* waiting on electrical work and some monitoring and control interface development
 +
::* planning tests this fall
 +
 +
* Presentation on status of CPS at Hall D meeting
 +
::* will circulate draft talk for comments/feedback
 +
 +
 +
FLUENT MODEL
 +
 +
* Model consistency checks
 +
::* coordinate systems needed to be made consistent between Bogdan/Gabriel FLUKA model and Fluent
 +
 +
* Working on next iteration - need to make consistent mesh with Fluent
 +
::* one approach: for each point (x,y,z) in table need power deposition - need to find points that are nearby in Fluent model representative then do interpolation
 +
::* another approach: remove all not relevant points (those that give zero results)
 +
 +
* Note: good to make models consistent from the start
 +
 +
 +
HALL D CPS DESIGN
 +
 +
* Longer design (3m) with longer magnetic field (2T)
 +
 +
* Planning fo finish conceptual design and hold a design review in Winter 2022/23, then begin optimization
 +
 +
* Main person working on design: V. Baturin
 +
 +
 +
FLUKA SIMULATIONS
 +
 +
* power deposition in copper block is complete
 +
::* scale beam power as needed - power deposition proportional to beam power
 +
 +
* simulations for shielding are ongoing
 +
 +
 +
REMAINING DESIGN AND OTHER
 +
 +
* remaining shielding
 +
* plastic
 +
* final design absorber
 +
* infrastructure list including moving experiment downstreams (assumed operations)
 +
 +
 +
PLANS FOR TCS PROPOSAL
 +
 +
* In approach towards submission of a TCS proposal consider addressing PAC concerns on the experiment
 +
::* see PAC report - detailed technical concerns are listed there
 +
 +
* Polarized TCS science case seems good - no need to change at least not right away
 +
 +
* Discussion about path forward - major item: make a plan for addressing PAC concerns in coordinated way
 +
 +
 +
NEXT MEETING: FRIDAY 14 OCTOBER AT 8:00AM ET

Revision as of 08:13, 16 September 2022

Discussion items:

  • Design models, stress/thermal calculations
  • Engineering analysis and planning
  • TCS updates
  • Other


PARTICIPANTS: Amy Comer, Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Brannon Semp, Donal Day, Deb Biswas, Hamlet Mkrtchyan, Hovanes Egiyan, Steven Lassiter, Marie Boer, Rolf Ent, Vardan Tadevosyan, Yeranuhi Ghandilyan, Tanja Horn

ENGINEERING/DESIGN

  • PR sent out for magnet steel, coil, etc.
  • Prototype
  • waiting on electrical work and some monitoring and control interface development
  • planning tests this fall
  • Presentation on status of CPS at Hall D meeting
  • will circulate draft talk for comments/feedback


FLUENT MODEL

  • Model consistency checks
  • coordinate systems needed to be made consistent between Bogdan/Gabriel FLUKA model and Fluent
  • Working on next iteration - need to make consistent mesh with Fluent
  • one approach: for each point (x,y,z) in table need power deposition - need to find points that are nearby in Fluent model representative then do interpolation
  • another approach: remove all not relevant points (those that give zero results)
  • Note: good to make models consistent from the start


HALL D CPS DESIGN

  • Longer design (3m) with longer magnetic field (2T)
  • Planning fo finish conceptual design and hold a design review in Winter 2022/23, then begin optimization
  • Main person working on design: V. Baturin


FLUKA SIMULATIONS

  • power deposition in copper block is complete
  • scale beam power as needed - power deposition proportional to beam power
  • simulations for shielding are ongoing


REMAINING DESIGN AND OTHER

  • remaining shielding
  • plastic
  • final design absorber
  • infrastructure list including moving experiment downstreams (assumed operations)


PLANS FOR TCS PROPOSAL

  • In approach towards submission of a TCS proposal consider addressing PAC concerns on the experiment
  • see PAC report - detailed technical concerns are listed there
  • Polarized TCS science case seems good - no need to change at least not right away
  • Discussion about path forward - major item: make a plan for addressing PAC concerns in coordinated way


NEXT MEETING: FRIDAY 14 OCTOBER AT 8:00AM ET

Retrieved from "https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/index.php?title=Meeting_16_September_2022&oldid=5050"