Difference between revisions of "Meeting 26 August 2022"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "PARTICIPANTS: Steven L., Amy, Gabriel, Gyang, Hamlet, Marie, Rolf, Yeran, Bert, Tanja, Mahmoud Gomina '''ENGINEERING UPDATE''' * CPS prototype - machining complete of testi...") |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
− | '''ENGINEERING UPDATE''' | + | '''ENGINEERING UPDATE''' [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/6/69/Status-Aug-26-2022.pptx Slides] |
* CPS prototype - machining complete of testing hardware; testing anticipated to begin in late fall | * CPS prototype - machining complete of testing hardware; testing anticipated to begin in late fall |
Latest revision as of 14:48, 20 September 2022
PARTICIPANTS: Steven L., Amy, Gabriel, Gyang, Hamlet, Marie, Rolf, Yeran, Bert, Tanja, Mahmoud Gomina
ENGINEERING UPDATE Slides
- CPS prototype - machining complete of testing hardware; testing anticipated to begin in late fall
- TOSCA Modeling
- CPS Coils and Steel Procurement
- CPS magnet and assembly layout
- 3D thermal and fluent model
- initial studies with assumptions on velocity of fluid (1.8m/s), applied field flux (16666666 W/ms) and shape, inlet temperature (298.15K), walls of pole and absorber with convection (5 W/m2K)
- good progress with this testing and verification stage - no profile (optics) yet in
- Fringe fields (magnetic field 1-2 m from center of magnet)
- it's a few hundred Gauss
- Alignment magnet to collimator (3mm) - how is optimization of positioning of CPS done
- support stands etc. (accuracy of 1/2 mm)
- 1/2mm should be doable - very big magnets can be done to 1mm
DESIGN OPTIMIZATION
- Update from simulations on investigation of CPS with less tungsten and/or lead
- Discussion about cutting blocks for exit channel, holes for mounting etc.
- tungsten is cast material - machining more difficult than, e.g., copper, but has been done
NEXT MEETING: FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 16TH AT 8:00AM ET