Difference between revisions of "Meeting 27 August 2021"

From Cuawiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "DISCUSSION ITEMS * Design models, stress/thermal calculations * Engineering analysis and planning * TCS updates * Other")
 
 
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
* Other
 
* Other
 +
 +
 +
PARTICIPANTS: Amy Comer, Arshak Asaturyan, Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Donal Day, Rolf Ent, Hamlet Mkrtchyan, Marie Boer, Petr Stepanov, Tanja Horn, Tristan Anderson, Vardan Tadevosyan
 +
 +
'''DESIGN/ENGINEERING''' (Steven, Amy, Bogdan)
 +
 +
* Copper absorber prototype modeling and FEA ongoing
 +
::* initial results of the simulations summarized in ppt slides - checking different scenarios
 +
::* some details need to be further investigated, but overall looks promising
 +
 +
* Quote requests for the copper absorber have been sent out to vendors
 +
 +
* Fluent model - good progress
 +
 +
* Bert has been working on updating the coils and magnets to the longer lengths
 +
 +
* Waiting for response from Elmet before making decision on how to proceed with Tungsten blocks
 +
::* bids are coming higher than estimated, so far no information received from Elmet
 +
 +
* Additional lead bricks will be available from MIT-Bates
 +
 +
* Gabriel will check optimal position of tungsten/lead with simulation
 +
 +
 +
'''TRANSVERSE TARGET MAGNET UPDATE'''
 +
 +
* From Chris K.: Scientific Magnetics is making good progress
 +
::* coils are assembled and quench protection circuitry is in place - will be wired next week
 +
::* Vacuum chamber and cryocooler are assembled and have been successfully tested (no leaks, pulse tube reached <4K, etc.)
 +
::* Magnet will be installed in the cryostat in September
 +
::* A few cooldowns are expected to optimize placement of shims and to reach the required field uniformity
 +
 +
* Action: ask Chris K for update on shims, field uniformity, etc. sometime in September
 +
 +
 +
'''TCS TRACKING UPDATE''' (Vardan)
 +
 +
* Investigated backtracking to account for deviations from linear regression
 +
 +
* Both methods of tracking give very similar results - backtracking works a little better, dependend on momentum
 +
 +
* Need to check on magnetic field sign outside target
 +
 +
 +
'''NEXT MEETING: FRIDAY 24 SEPTEMBER AT 8AM ET'''

Latest revision as of 23:04, 29 August 2021

DISCUSSION ITEMS

  • Design models, stress/thermal calculations
  • Engineering analysis and planning
  • TCS updates
  • Other


PARTICIPANTS: Amy Comer, Arshak Asaturyan, Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Donal Day, Rolf Ent, Hamlet Mkrtchyan, Marie Boer, Petr Stepanov, Tanja Horn, Tristan Anderson, Vardan Tadevosyan

DESIGN/ENGINEERING (Steven, Amy, Bogdan)

  • Copper absorber prototype modeling and FEA ongoing
  • initial results of the simulations summarized in ppt slides - checking different scenarios
  • some details need to be further investigated, but overall looks promising
  • Quote requests for the copper absorber have been sent out to vendors
  • Fluent model - good progress
  • Bert has been working on updating the coils and magnets to the longer lengths
  • Waiting for response from Elmet before making decision on how to proceed with Tungsten blocks
  • bids are coming higher than estimated, so far no information received from Elmet
  • Additional lead bricks will be available from MIT-Bates
  • Gabriel will check optimal position of tungsten/lead with simulation


TRANSVERSE TARGET MAGNET UPDATE

  • From Chris K.: Scientific Magnetics is making good progress
  • coils are assembled and quench protection circuitry is in place - will be wired next week
  • Vacuum chamber and cryocooler are assembled and have been successfully tested (no leaks, pulse tube reached <4K, etc.)
  • Magnet will be installed in the cryostat in September
  • A few cooldowns are expected to optimize placement of shims and to reach the required field uniformity
  • Action: ask Chris K for update on shims, field uniformity, etc. sometime in September


TCS TRACKING UPDATE (Vardan)

  • Investigated backtracking to account for deviations from linear regression
  • Both methods of tracking give very similar results - backtracking works a little better, dependend on momentum
  • Need to check on magnetic field sign outside target


NEXT MEETING: FRIDAY 24 SEPTEMBER AT 8AM ET