Meeting 28 August 2020

From Cuawiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

DISCUSSION TOPICS:

  • Simulations Update
  • Shielding and magnet model
  • Hall A/C model and design/implementation
  • Hall D design and radiation simulations
  • Other


PARTICIPANTS: A. Comer, A. Asaturyan, R. Ent, H. Mkrtchyan, I. Strakovsky, V. Tadevosyan, T. Horn, J. Crafts, S. Dobbs, B. Wojsekhowski, David H., T. Keppel


SUMMARY NOTES

SIMULATIONS

  • Work ongoing


SHIELDING AND MAGNET MODEL (Josh)

  • Shielding stacked up to top of magnet - plate added on top to make things level
  • Openings in front and back of shielding implemented
  • Flared downstream end - still need feedback from radiation simulation to finalize
  • Inlet of LCW cooling water is on upstream end - in same place as beam pipe
  • advantageous from radiation point of view: high energy particles go forward (few GeV based on e beam), energy of particles going backward is soft
  • Next steps:
  • Build rest of shield taking into account any feedback on points below
  • Need for taping on front end
  • Size of beam pipe and material needed - then can build around and make support structure
  • Structural support of tungsten powder - need more information on tungsten blocks
  • Thermal calculation for extension of core in longitudinal direction - work ongoing


ENGINEERING/DESIGN (Amy)

  • Work ongoing, e.g. thermal calculations
  • Action item: dimensions of beam pipe, etc.


HALL D DESIGN/ENGINEERING (Sean)

  • Work ongoing on front end


PAC48 RECAP

  • All comments based on close out session - report should be available soon
  • Hall D/KLong:
  • science case well received, some concern about higher level management coordination
  • Hall A/C TCS
  • Science well received
  • Main comment: need for more information on experimental setup - see if experiment is possible
  • one issue: GEM as part of trigger - high risk since never done before
  • one possible option: find out if GEM in SRO works as done for TDIS
  • Action item: Vardan present current assumptions on trigger

NPS+CPS installation - COMPLEMENTARITY

  • So far no objections based on physics


NEW CPS PHYSICS EXPERIMENT IDEAS (Bogdan)

  • Two photon exchange experiment - with photon beam from CPS better intensity, use secondary target downstream plus some detectors - need to work out details


NEXT MEETING : FRIDAY 11 SEPTEMBER AT 11AM ET