Difference between revisions of "EPSCI SRO Meeting Jun. 9, 2020"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "=== Connection Info: === This meeting scheduled via MS Teams. Join link should be in your calendar. <!-----------------------------------------------------------------------...") |
m (Davidl moved page EPSCI SRO Meeting Jun. 8, 2020 to EPSCI SRO Meeting Jun. 9, 2020: Meeting date moved) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
# [[EPSCI SRO Meeting Jun. 1, 2020| Previous Meeting]] | # [[EPSCI SRO Meeting Jun. 1, 2020| Previous Meeting]] | ||
# Announcements | # Announcements | ||
| + | # Data Format ([[Media:20200609_data_format.pdf |slides]]) | ||
# CLAS12 Task Force | # CLAS12 Task Force | ||
# Hall-B testbeds | # Hall-B testbeds | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
=== Minutes: === | === Minutes: === | ||
| − | + | Attendees: David L., Carl T., Jie C., Nathan B., Vardan G., Chris L., Dave A., Graham H. | |
| − | + | '''File Format''' | |
| + | * Dave A. showed a few ([[Media:20200609_data_format.pdf |slides]]) to initiate a conversation on SRO data format | ||
| + | * We could consider adopting a format similar to the CODA event format which maps well to SRO systems | ||
| + | ** Benefit is it allows aggregating smaller time slice blocks which decreases overhead ratio | ||
| + | * Some discussion on redundancy of information in format (e.g. time slice number and time stamp) | ||
| + | * More thought needed on merging this with Graham's draft SRO format which does not explicitly include aggregation | ||
| + | * Will continue discussion next week | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Other Topics''' | ||
| + | * We ended the meeting at 3pm due to conflict with another meeting. | ||
Latest revision as of 13:08, 15 June 2020
Connection Info:
This meeting scheduled via MS Teams. Join link should be in your calendar.
Agenda:
- Previous Meeting
- Announcements
- Data Format (slides)
- CLAS12 Task Force
- Hall-B testbeds
- Updating specs in ERSAP Document
- CLARA + JANA + GEMC = SRO
- AOT
Useful References
Minutes:
Attendees: David L., Carl T., Jie C., Nathan B., Vardan G., Chris L., Dave A., Graham H.
File Format
- Dave A. showed a few (slides) to initiate a conversation on SRO data format
- We could consider adopting a format similar to the CODA event format which maps well to SRO systems
- Benefit is it allows aggregating smaller time slice blocks which decreases overhead ratio
- Some discussion on redundancy of information in format (e.g. time slice number and time stamp)
- More thought needed on merging this with Graham's draft SRO format which does not explicitly include aggregation
- Will continue discussion next week
Other Topics
- We ended the meeting at 3pm due to conflict with another meeting.