Difference between revisions of "EJFAT UDP Single Thread Packet Sending and Receiving"

From epsciwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
  
  
<font size="+2">Conclusions</font><br>
+
<font size="+2">Observations</font><br>
<font size="+1">Notice how the data rate spikes when the core used to send is in the same NUMA node as the NIC itself. In addition, the faster rates always corresponded to the closer NUMA node. Setting the sender's core to get the best performance is a necessity as running the program without specifying it defaults to a low core # such as 8 or 10. The core must be specified to be in the range 80-87 in order to get the best performance. Note that running in realtime RR scheduling made the program considerably slower and uneven in performance. It would not run in the realtime FIFO mode at all.</font>
+
<font size="+1">Notice the strange retrograde behavior. I have no idea what is going on behind the scenes to produce this effect.</font>

Revision as of 16:11, 12 September 2022

Transmission between sender on ejfat-2 and the LB on ejfat-1 and from there to receiver on ejfat-1(Sep 2022)

Here we test the data rate between a single threaded UDP sender and a single threaded receiver. Data was sent from ejfat-2 to LB on ejfat-1 (172.19.22.241), using

./packetBlaster -p 19522 -host 172.19.22.241 -mtu 9000 -s 25000000  -b 100000 -cores 80

in which the UDP Send buffer = 50MB and the app sent buffers of 100kB. The receiver was run as:

./packetBlastee  -p 17750 -b 400000 -r 25000000 -cores 80

The sending and receiving threads were pinned to core #80. This is because cores 80-87 are on the same NUMA node as the NIC and perform by far the best when transferring data. When the same test was run pinning the threads to core #1 (on worst performing node) the max transfer rate was 1000 MB/s. After that packets were constantly being dropped.


The following graph shows the CPU usage of both sender and receiver as a function of the data rate.


"Data Source Stream Processing"


Observations
Notice the strange retrograde behavior. I have no idea what is going on behind the scenes to produce this effect.