Difference between revisions of "AIEC Wish list"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | * Make sure that the initialization is scaling the gcf to its mean pressure equivalent, if it is not doing that already. So far all the inits have been done at mean pressure or close to it. | + | * CDC Make sure that the initialization is scaling the gcf to its mean pressure equivalent, if it is not doing that already. So far all the inits have been done at mean pressure or close to it. |
| − | * CDC - need to scale 2018 gains up (gcf down) by 6% & retrain. | + | ** CDC - need to scale 2018 gains up (gcf down) by 6% & retrain. |
| − | * CDC - look more closely to find what the correction should be. See if we can match beam current & radiator (ideally amo) & pressure. | + | ** CDC - look more closely to find what the correction should be. See if we can match beam current & radiator (ideally amo) & pressure. |
| + | ** Separate the EPICS readings & rethink the averaging times. | ||
| + | *** Use the wait and see approach for the HVB current - a few seconds of beam-on time is probably good enough. | ||
| + | *** Use a longer lookback for the temperature, because the readout is coarse and the value is important for the UQ. We would have to use the mean instead of the max - maybe 1 minute? | ||
| + | *** Consider what to use for pressure. Maybe 1 minutes is good? | ||
* FDC - correlation between gcf & pressure was good for 2020, inconsistent for 2018. Torri needs to talk to Lubomir. | * FDC - correlation between gcf & pressure was good for 2020, inconsistent for 2018. Torri needs to talk to Lubomir. | ||
Revision as of 17:55, 12 September 2022
- CDC Make sure that the initialization is scaling the gcf to its mean pressure equivalent, if it is not doing that already. So far all the inits have been done at mean pressure or close to it.
- CDC - need to scale 2018 gains up (gcf down) by 6% & retrain.
- CDC - look more closely to find what the correction should be. See if we can match beam current & radiator (ideally amo) & pressure.
- Separate the EPICS readings & rethink the averaging times.
- Use the wait and see approach for the HVB current - a few seconds of beam-on time is probably good enough.
- Use a longer lookback for the temperature, because the readout is coarse and the value is important for the UQ. We would have to use the mean instead of the max - maybe 1 minute?
- Consider what to use for pressure. Maybe 1 minutes is good?
- FDC - correlation between gcf & pressure was good for 2020, inconsistent for 2018. Torri needs to talk to Lubomir.
- BCAL - baselines and crate temperatures. Need an executive status summary.
- Other detectors - for capstone students. Make a list of useful calibration tables & detectors. Naomi will ask the experts for a list of tables.