Difference between revisions of "AIEC Weekly Meeting June 1, 2023"

From epsciwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "=== Agenda: === # Previous Meeting #: # Announcements: #: # Activities: #: #* <b> roboCDC: </b> #** Hall-D is down for ~1yr. #** Model tr...")
 
Line 17: Line 17:
 
#* [https://indico.jlab.org/event/459/contributions/11374/ CHEP talk] ''Thomas''
 
#* [https://indico.jlab.org/event/459/contributions/11374/ CHEP talk] ''Thomas''
 
#:
 
#:
 +
 +
[[File:2023.05.31.project_block.png|400px]]
 +
=== Minutes ===
 +
* We shared with Igal what we have learned regarding the lack of correlation between LED peak position and existing calibration constants (gains) from the CCDB.
 +
** David's anecdotal plot (see above) was discussed.
 +
* We discussed what previous evidence Igal had seen for a correlation. He noted that the results were inconsistent across blocks.
 +
** We reviewed some of Igal's plots from the [[AIEC Weekly Meeting Feb. 22, 2023|Feb. 22, 2023 AIEC meeting]].
 +
*** We noted that the strongest evidence appeared to be from the [https://wiki.jlab.org/epsciwiki/images/a/a4/Plot_primex-phase1_led_1344.pdf block 1344 in ring 1 plot]. However, we concluded that this was most likely due to radiation damage.
 +
*** We looked for evidence in the [https://wiki.jlab.org/epsciwiki/images/5/59/Plot_primex-phase1_led_707.pdf block 707 in ring 9 plot], but were not convinced that a correlation was clearly evident.
 +
*:
 +
* We reviewed some of Torri's plots where the ratio of individual blocks to the sum of all blocks was plotted against the pi0 derived calibration constants.
 +
** Igal noted that the quadrants have different pulsers so we should use the overlap of a ring with the quadrant for the average rather than the whole FCAL.
 +
** We may also want to plot individual colors so the x-axis stretches out more to show potential correlations.
 +
*:
 +
* Igal suggested one cause of the LED amplitude shifts could be due to temperature changes related to frequent accesses to the FCAL dark box during the first PrimEx run (run numbers 60XXX). He said they did not observe so many fluctuations in the section PrimEx run which had fewer dark box accesses.
 +
* Igal suggested looking at the CompCal might be easier since it had a more carefully designed LED system that was much more stable.
 +
** n.b. the CompCal has since been disassembled and will never be in use again.
 +
*:
 +
* David suggested spending 1 more week to seek out a LED-gain correlation in the FCAL and then pivoting to the CompCal.
 +
 +
==== Action Items ====
 +
# Investigate temperature for a possible correlation with the LED peak position drifts
 +
# Reproduce ratio plots vs. CCDB values:
 +
#* use only reliable blocks from same quadrant for sum
 +
#* Plot only small and large blue so x-axis covers smaller range
 +
# Decide how to proceed for remainder of project (FCAL, CompCal, other?)

Revision as of 13:04, 5 June 2023

Agenda:

  1. Previous Meeting
  2. Announcements:
  3. Activities:
    • roboCDC:
      • Hall-D is down for ~1yr.
      • Model training script runs :)
      • Test procedure for Hot Checkout just before next run?
  4. Talks/Presentations

2023.05.31.project block.png

Minutes

  • We shared with Igal what we have learned regarding the lack of correlation between LED peak position and existing calibration constants (gains) from the CCDB.
    • David's anecdotal plot (see above) was discussed.
  • We discussed what previous evidence Igal had seen for a correlation. He noted that the results were inconsistent across blocks.
  • We reviewed some of Torri's plots where the ratio of individual blocks to the sum of all blocks was plotted against the pi0 derived calibration constants.
    • Igal noted that the quadrants have different pulsers so we should use the overlap of a ring with the quadrant for the average rather than the whole FCAL.
    • We may also want to plot individual colors so the x-axis stretches out more to show potential correlations.
  • Igal suggested one cause of the LED amplitude shifts could be due to temperature changes related to frequent accesses to the FCAL dark box during the first PrimEx run (run numbers 60XXX). He said they did not observe so many fluctuations in the section PrimEx run which had fewer dark box accesses.
  • Igal suggested looking at the CompCal might be easier since it had a more carefully designed LED system that was much more stable.
    • n.b. the CompCal has since been disassembled and will never be in use again.
  • David suggested spending 1 more week to seek out a LED-gain correlation in the FCAL and then pivoting to the CompCal.

Action Items

  1. Investigate temperature for a possible correlation with the LED peak position drifts
  2. Reproduce ratio plots vs. CCDB values:
    • use only reliable blocks from same quadrant for sum
    • Plot only small and large blue so x-axis covers smaller range
  3. Decide how to proceed for remainder of project (FCAL, CompCal, other?)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.jlab.org/epsciwiki/index.php?title=AIEC_Weekly_Meeting_June_1,_2023&oldid=3473"