Difference between revisions of "Autoscaling-jiriaf"

From epsciwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " = Supporting Horizontal Pod Autoscaling (HPA) in Kubernetes = == Introduction == This document addresses critical insights and solutions for effectively implementing Horizo...")
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
== Introduction ==
 
== Introduction ==
  
This document addresses critical insights and solutions for effectively implementing Horizontal Pod Autoscaling (HPA) in Kubernetes for VK, with a focus on ensuring that VK creates correct pod conditions, which are essential for HPA to function as intended.
+
This document provides essential insights and solutions for the effective implementation of Horizontal Pod Autoscaling (HPA) in Kubernetes, specifically for VK. It emphasizes the importance of VK establishing accurate pod conditions, crucial for the optimal functioning of HPA.
  
 
== Understanding Autoscaling through Code Analysis ==
 
== Understanding Autoscaling through Code Analysis ==

Revision as of 15:14, 20 March 2024

Supporting Horizontal Pod Autoscaling (HPA) in Kubernetes

Introduction

This document provides essential insights and solutions for the effective implementation of Horizontal Pod Autoscaling (HPA) in Kubernetes, specifically for VK. It emphasizes the importance of VK establishing accurate pod conditions, crucial for the optimal functioning of HPA.

Understanding Autoscaling through Code Analysis

The HPA mechanism relies heavily on specific Kubernetes code to evaluate pod readiness, especially concerning CPU resource scaling. The following snippet from the [Kubernetes source code|https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/v1.29.3/pkg/controller/podautoscaler/replica_calculator.go#L378] illustrates this process:

if resource == v1.ResourceCPU {
    var unready bool
    _, condition := podutil.GetPodCondition(&pod.Status, v1.PodReady)
    if condition == nil || pod.Status.StartTime == nil {
        unready = true
    } else {
        if pod.Status.StartTime.Add(cpuInitializationPeriod).After(time.Now()) {
            unready = condition.Status == v1.ConditionFalse || metric.Timestamp.Before(condition.LastTransitionTime.Time.Add(metric.Window))
        } else {
            unready = condition.Status == v1.ConditionFalse && pod.Status.StartTime.Add(delayOfInitialReadinessStatus).After(condition.LastTransitionTime.Time)
        }
    }
    if unready {
        unreadyPods.Insert(pod.Name)
        continue
    }
}

This critical piece of logic helps ensure that only ready and appropriately initialized pods are considered for scaling actions based on CPU usage.

Implementing Correct Pod Conditions

For HPA to function as intended, it's crucial to correctly set pod conditions upon creation and update their status based on lifecycle events accurately.

Pod Creation (CreatePod)

The initial conditions for running and failed pods need to reflect their true state to avoid misinterpretation by the HPA logic.

  • startTime is the time when the pod was created.
  • The podReady status is determined by the current phase of the pod:
    • If a pod has failed, podReady is set to False.
    • If a pod is currently running, podReady is set to True.
  • The conditions of the pod are updated as follows:
pod.Status.Conditions = []v1.PodCondition{
  {
    Type:               v1.PodScheduled,
    Status:             v1.ConditionTrue,
    LastTransitionTime: startTime,
  },
  {
    Type:               v1.PodReady,
    Status:             podReady,
    LastTransitionTime: startTime,
  },
  {
    Type:               v1.PodInitialized,
    Status:             v1.ConditionTrue,
    LastTransitionTime: startTime,
  },
}

Retrieving Pods (GetPods)

The operation of a pod is heavily dependent on its readiness status. This status is encapsulated by the podReady variable. Another significant attribute is LastTransitionTime, which records the time of the last status change.

  • prevPodStartTime is equivalent to startTime in the CreatePod method.
  • prevContainerStartTime[pod.Spec.Containers[0].Name] denotes the start time of the first container in the pod. This holds true even for multiple containers, as they all initiate simultaneously.
  • The podReady status is determined by the current phase of the pod:
    • If a pod has either failed or succeeded, podReady is set to False.
    • If a pod is currently running, podReady is set to True.
  • The conditions of the pod are updated as follows:
Conditions: []v1.PodCondition{
  {
    Type:   v1.PodScheduled,
    Status: v1.ConditionTrue,
    LastTransitionTime: *prevPodStartTime,
  },
  {
    Type:   v1.PodInitialized,
    Status: v1.ConditionTrue,
    LastTransitionTime: *prevPodStartTime,
  },
  {
    Type:   v1.PodReady,
    Status: podReady,
    LastTransitionTime: prevContainerStartTime[pod.Spec.Containers[0].Name],
  },
}

Conclusion

Understanding and implementing pod condition checks correctly is crucial for effective use of Horizontal Pod Autoscaling in Kubernetes. By ensuring accurate status and condition reporting, we can enhance the reliability and efficiency of autoscaled deployments.