Difference between revisions of "Discussion of: Deep learning level-3 electron trigger for CLAS12"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Cissie == | == Cissie == | ||
* Related reading: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.06869 CLAS12 Track Reconstruction with Artificial Intelligence] | * Related reading: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.06869 CLAS12 Track Reconstruction with Artificial Intelligence] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == David == | ||
+ | * Page 4, right column: Stride = (1,2). Is this effectively just convolving 2 values? | ||
+ | * Fig. 9: They are mainly focused on the left edge where the efficiency is above the 99.5% level (dotted grey line). This is the region of the steepest gradient of purity (i.e. dpurity/dresponse is large) | ||
+ | * Fig. 10 (described at bottom of page 6) is for tracks from real data. Wouldn't this include the hardware trigger already? | ||
+ | * Fig. 12: The linear extrapolation of the traditional trigger looks like they are being generous. In reality, the traditional trigger probably does much worse are higher beam currents. If a curve was fit to the actual data points shown though, the extrapolation to 90nA would have a negative purity which is unphysical. | ||
+ | * <s>Eqn. 4 seems like it should be a ratio rather than a difference. Specifically, wouldn't the data reduction be the ratio of P_AI to P_CLAS12? The data rate for a given trigger would proportional to (TP+FP)</s> |
Revision as of 03:36, 4 October 2023
Cissie
- Related reading: CLAS12 Track Reconstruction with Artificial Intelligence
David
- Page 4, right column: Stride = (1,2). Is this effectively just convolving 2 values?
- Fig. 9: They are mainly focused on the left edge where the efficiency is above the 99.5% level (dotted grey line). This is the region of the steepest gradient of purity (i.e. dpurity/dresponse is large)
- Fig. 10 (described at bottom of page 6) is for tracks from real data. Wouldn't this include the hardware trigger already?
- Fig. 12: The linear extrapolation of the traditional trigger looks like they are being generous. In reality, the traditional trigger probably does much worse are higher beam currents. If a curve was fit to the actual data points shown though, the extrapolation to 90nA would have a negative purity which is unphysical.
Eqn. 4 seems like it should be a ratio rather than a difference. Specifically, wouldn't the data reduction be the ratio of P_AI to P_CLAS12? The data rate for a given trigger would proportional to (TP+FP)