Difference between revisions of "Discussion of: Learning Classical and machine learning methods for event reconstruction in NeuLAND"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " David: * ''"In turn, FAIRRoot is based on ROOT, an omnipresent software package in nuclear and particle physics"'' * Apache Parquet format (preferred for speed and file size)...") |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* 4 different feature sets: One with just 3 cumulative values, one with info for each bar, one that combines the two, and one that identifies hits in pixels (with time and energy being the "colors") | * 4 different feature sets: One with just 3 cumulative values, one with info for each bar, one that combines the two, and one that identifies hits in pixels (with time and energy being the "colors") | ||
* ''"All models performed worse when working with the thou- sands of inputs of the Bars dataset than with the three values of the Tri dataset."'' | * ''"All models performed worse when working with the thou- sands of inputs of the Bars dataset than with the three values of the Tri dataset."'' | ||
+ | * ''"some models ... perform significantly worse when trained on the number of primary neutrons instead of the (actually detected) number of primary hits."'' | ||
+ | * Perhaps more time could have been spent on feature engineering? |
Latest revision as of 01:54, 19 January 2022
David:
- "In turn, FAIRRoot is based on ROOT, an omnipresent software package in nuclear and particle physics"
- Apache Parquet format (preferred for speed and file size)
- 4 different feature sets: One with just 3 cumulative values, one with info for each bar, one that combines the two, and one that identifies hits in pixels (with time and energy being the "colors")
- "All models performed worse when working with the thou- sands of inputs of the Bars dataset than with the three values of the Tri dataset."
- "some models ... perform significantly worse when trained on the number of primary neutrons instead of the (actually detected) number of primary hits."
- Perhaps more time could have been spent on feature engineering?