Difference between revisions of "Discussion of: Learning Classical and machine learning methods for event reconstruction in NeuLAND"

From epsciwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " David: * ''"In turn, FAIRRoot is based on ROOT, an omnipresent software package in nuclear and particle physics"'' * Apache Parquet format (preferred for speed and file size)...")
 
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
* 4 different feature sets: One with just 3 cumulative values, one with info for each bar, one that combines the two, and one that identifies hits in pixels (with time and energy being the "colors")
 
* 4 different feature sets: One with just 3 cumulative values, one with info for each bar, one that combines the two, and one that identifies hits in pixels (with time and energy being the "colors")
 
* ''"All models performed worse when working with the thou- sands of inputs of the Bars dataset than with the three values of the Tri dataset."''
 
* ''"All models performed worse when working with the thou- sands of inputs of the Bars dataset than with the three values of the Tri dataset."''
 +
* ''"some models ... perform significantly worse when trained on the number of primary neutrons instead of the (actually detected) number of primary hits."''
 +
* Perhaps more time could have been spent on feature engineering?

Latest revision as of 01:54, 19 January 2022

David:

  • "In turn, FAIRRoot is based on ROOT, an omnipresent software package in nuclear and particle physics"
  • Apache Parquet format (preferred for speed and file size)
  • 4 different feature sets: One with just 3 cumulative values, one with info for each bar, one that combines the two, and one that identifies hits in pixels (with time and energy being the "colors")
  • "All models performed worse when working with the thou- sands of inputs of the Bars dataset than with the three values of the Tri dataset."
  • "some models ... perform significantly worse when trained on the number of primary neutrons instead of the (actually detected) number of primary hits."
  • Perhaps more time could have been spent on feature engineering?