Difference between revisions of "AIEC Wish list"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* CDC | * CDC | ||
*# Done (was done all along, 2021) ''Make sure that the initialization is scaling the gcf to its mean pressure equivalent, if it is not doing that already. So far all the inits have been done at mean pressure or close to it.'' | *# Done (was done all along, 2021) ''Make sure that the initialization is scaling the gcf to its mean pressure equivalent, if it is not doing that already. So far all the inits have been done at mean pressure or close to it.'' | ||
| − | *# Done (Naomi - closer to 3% | + | *# Done (Naomi - closer to 3% [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5813 Sept 2022]) ''Look more closely to find what the 6% correction should be. See if we can match beam current & radiator (ideally amo) & pressure. '' |
| − | *# Scale 2018 gains up (gcf down) by the improved "6%" & add to the model. | + | *# Scale 2018 gains up (gcf down) by the improved "6%" & add to the model. [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5813 see docdb] |
*# Separate the EPICS readings & rethink the averaging times. | *# Separate the EPICS readings & rethink the averaging times. | ||
*#* Use the wait and see approach for the HVB current - a few seconds of beam-on time is probably good enough. | *#* Use the wait and see approach for the HVB current - a few seconds of beam-on time is probably good enough. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* BCAL - baselines and crate temperatures. Need an executive status summary. | * BCAL - baselines and crate temperatures. Need an executive status summary. | ||
* Other detectors - for capstone students. | * Other detectors - for capstone students. | ||
| − | *# Done (Naomi) ''Make a list of useful calibration tables & detectors. Ask the experts.'' | + | *# Done (Naomi) ''Make a list of useful calibration tables & detectors. Ask the experts.''[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cPaSrAiwM-_EmqCsJrMzZUCJFPWTxmoAfXBMotrDsVM/edit?usp=sharing CCDB] [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1C6lJ3S_5pj_ariDfMVNg5n1iyFbjDV4QYBcpYHo6-90/edit?usp=sharing EPICS] |
Revision as of 15:34, 25 October 2022
- CDC
- Done (was done all along, 2021) Make sure that the initialization is scaling the gcf to its mean pressure equivalent, if it is not doing that already. So far all the inits have been done at mean pressure or close to it.
- Done (Naomi - closer to 3% Sept 2022) Look more closely to find what the 6% correction should be. See if we can match beam current & radiator (ideally amo) & pressure.
- Scale 2018 gains up (gcf down) by the improved "6%" & add to the model. see docdb
- Separate the EPICS readings & rethink the averaging times.
- Use the wait and see approach for the HVB current - a few seconds of beam-on time is probably good enough.
- Use a longer lookback for the temperature, because the readout is coarse and the value is important for the UQ. We would have to use the mean instead of the max - maybe 1 minute?
- Consider what to use for pressure. Maybe 1 minute is good?
- In progress (Diana) Set up a standard series of tests for the raw gcfs from a new model, and also for the UQ corrected data. Start with a book of plots and possibly automate looking through the book.
- Done (Thomas) - switching to data-collection outside the 3% confidence bubble. Discuss an option for "this is it" or "get more data", when to use auto-off and should there be an auto-on.
- Done, unseen (Diana) Plot predicted std dev from the model vs the difference between predicted and traditional gcfs.
- Done (Thomas/Diana) Re-enable the HVB current.
- Done (Thomas/Torri, 11 Oct) - keep RoboCDC running but recommend 2125 for non-full-target runs. ie auto-collect for ET.
- In progress (Naomi). Start incorporating new PrimEx 2022 data. Naomi will get gcfs, Diana will get epics w Thomas's help.
- FDC - correlation between gcf & pressure was good for 2020, inconsistent for 2018. Torri needs to talk to Lubomir.