Difference between revisions of "Discussion of: An Automatic Framework to Build Neural Network-based Surrogate for High-Performance Computing Applications"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " David Notes: * Use of "Customized Autoencoder" to sparsify inputs is interesting. ** Are `const` parameters the primary values being filtered? * User inputs place boundaries...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | David Notes | + | == David Notes == |
* Use of "Customized Autoencoder" to sparsify inputs is interesting. | * Use of "Customized Autoencoder" to sparsify inputs is interesting. | ||
** Are `const` parameters the primary values being filtered? | ** Are `const` parameters the primary values being filtered? | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
** How is Bayesian used? (what are priors?) | ** How is Bayesian used? (what are priors?) | ||
* Feature to introduce perturbation into input features in cases where insufficient variation of data are available.(section 3.1, Step 3) | * Feature to introduce perturbation into input features in cases where insufficient variation of data are available.(section 3.1, Step 3) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Cissie == | ||
+ | * Slides: [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Z5SXj7-yfROGzdTcfkIgT6Tg1s1a5sANaa1rxGvTHTA Auto-HPCNet vs PHASM] |
Revision as of 16:34, 9 August 2023
David Notes
- Use of "Customized Autoencoder" to sparsify inputs is interesting.
- Are `const` parameters the primary values being filtered?
- User inputs place boundaries on accuracy and speed when optimizing topology and input features.
- How is Bayesian used? (what are priors?)
- Feature to introduce perturbation into input features in cases where insufficient variation of data are available.(section 3.1, Step 3)
Cissie
- Slides: Auto-HPCNet vs PHASM