Difference between revisions of "AIOP Sep. 23, 2024"
(Created page with "The current weekly meeting time is every other Monday at 13:00 US/Eastern === Connection Info: === <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"> You can connect using...") |
|||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
=== Minutes === | === Minutes === | ||
<!-- Attendees: Torri, David, Jiawei, Armen, Hovannes, Malachi --> | <!-- Attendees: Torri, David, Jiawei, Armen, Hovannes, Malachi --> | ||
+ | <h2>Meeting Notes</h2> | ||
+ | <p><strong>Attendees:</strong> Thomas, Patrick, David, Torri, Hovanes, Jiawei, Cristiano, Armen, Naomi</p> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Lawyers happy on both sides now</li> | ||
+ | <li>Conference preparations underway</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h3>Progress</h3> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li> | ||
+ | <strong>Patrick</strong> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li><strong>Diamond dosage</strong></li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Reached out to Jiawei | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Jiawei tried some suggestions from Hovanes and couldn’t come up with any absolute location dosage.</li> | ||
+ | <li>David reiterated the use of relative positions.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Hovanes was hoping that a combination of Richard’s scan would yield the edges/absolute position.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Hovanes asked Jiawei if the web interface was used.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li>Jiawei showed some plots of the diamond scans (comparing Richard to Hovanes) | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Very hard to orient.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Hovanes offered some suggestions on how to match up but agreed that with what Jiawei looked at, they can’t be matched up.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li>David asked about seeing what the nudge actually does (with respect to the coherent edge) as well as drift over time.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Patrick showed some of the GPR results on delta c predictions from delta E. | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Naomi asked about using a stable beam only.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Armen suggested other kernels/noise to enhance.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <li> | ||
+ | <strong>Armen</strong> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Showed some slides</li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Plot of reward vs position of edge vs required edge | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Did not like the possibility of getting a negative reward close to the required beam.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Changed reward to a step function… still not happy.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li>New environment: Normalize action/observation space.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Better reward distribution achieved!</li> | ||
+ | <li>Showed some TensorBoard plots about the training.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Reiterated the point that normalization is not preferred but saw evidence that a norm was needed.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h3>Milestone Review</h3> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Out of time. Please review the milestones (Patrick) 1-4 and address or tidy up.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
=== Milestones! === | === Milestones! === |
Latest revision as of 17:05, 7 October 2024
The current weekly meeting time is every other Monday at 13:00 US/Eastern
Connection Info:
You can connect using ZOOM Video conferencing (ID: 161 588 8669). (Click "Expand" to the right for details -->):
One tap mobile: US: +16692545252,,1602484178# or +16468287666,,1602484178#
Meeting URL: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1615888669?pwd=MnhGVUhpeEd3NVpnTGxoZHJManNBdz09&from=addon
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
Passcode: 561441
Join by Telephone
For higher quality, dial a number based on your current location.
Dial: +1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose)
+1 646 828 7666 US (New York)
+1 646 964 1167 US (US Spanish Line)
+1 551 285 1373 US (New Jersey)
+1 669 216 1590 US (San Jose)
+1 415 449 4000 US (US Spanish Line)
833 568 8864 US Toll-free
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
International numbers
Join from an H.323/SIP room system
H.323: 161.199.138.10 (US West)
161.199.136.10 (US East)
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
Passcode: 561441
SIP: 1615888669@sip.zoomgov.com
Passcode: 561441
One tap mobile: US: +16692545252,,1601987443# or +16468287666,,1601987443#
Meeting URL: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1615888669?pwd=MnhGVUhpeEd3NVpnTGxoZHJManNBdz09&from=addon
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
Passcode: 561441
AIOP - Polarized Photon Source
Agenda:
- Previous Meeting
- Announcements
- Conferences/Workshops
- PSTDP2024 (Sept. 22-27) (Patrick speaks 9/26 @ 10am)
- CHEP2024 (Oct. 19-25, Krakow, Poland)Oral presentation accepted (Torri)
- ICFA Beam Dynamics Mini-Workshop on Machine Learning for Particle Accelerators (Apr. 8-11 CERN)
- Project Progress
- Coherent peak drift refresher (Jiawei & Patrick)
- GitHub AIOP Project (AIOP-Photon issues)
- Milestones: PDF(GitHub AIOP Project AIOP-Photon issues FTE Profiles)
- PIER Activities
- Middle School Data Science Hackathon Workshop
HUGS mini-Workshop- COMPLETED!
- AOT
Minutes
Meeting Notes
Attendees: Thomas, Patrick, David, Torri, Hovanes, Jiawei, Cristiano, Armen, Naomi
- Lawyers happy on both sides now
- Conference preparations underway
Progress
-
Patrick
- Diamond dosage
- Reached out to Jiawei
- Jiawei tried some suggestions from Hovanes and couldn’t come up with any absolute location dosage.
- David reiterated the use of relative positions.
- Hovanes was hoping that a combination of Richard’s scan would yield the edges/absolute position.
- Hovanes asked Jiawei if the web interface was used.
- Jiawei showed some plots of the diamond scans (comparing Richard to Hovanes)
- Very hard to orient.
- Hovanes offered some suggestions on how to match up but agreed that with what Jiawei looked at, they can’t be matched up.
- David asked about seeing what the nudge actually does (with respect to the coherent edge) as well as drift over time.
- Patrick showed some of the GPR results on delta c predictions from delta E.
- Naomi asked about using a stable beam only.
- Armen suggested other kernels/noise to enhance.
-
Armen
- Showed some slides
- Plot of reward vs position of edge vs required edge
- Did not like the possibility of getting a negative reward close to the required beam.
- Changed reward to a step function… still not happy.
- New environment: Normalize action/observation space.
- Better reward distribution achieved!
- Showed some TensorBoard plots about the training.
- Reiterated the point that normalization is not preferred but saw evidence that a norm was needed.
Milestone Review
- Out of time. Please review the milestones (Patrick) 1-4 and address or tidy up.