Difference between revisions of "AIOP Nov. 18, 2024"

From epsciwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The current weekly meeting time is every other Monday at 13:00 US/Eastern === Connection Info: === <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"> You can connect using...")
 
Line 72: Line 72:
  
 
<!--Attendees: Naomi J., Patrick M., David L., Jiawei G., Torri J., Armen K.-->
 
<!--Attendees: Naomi J., Patrick M., David L., Jiawei G., Torri J., Armen K.-->
 +
<!DOCTYPE html>
 +
<html lang="en">
 +
<head>
 +
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
 +
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
 +
    <title>AIOP Meeting Notes - 11/18/24</title>
 +
</head>
 +
<body>
 +
    <h1>AIOP Meeting Notes - 11/18/24</h1>
 +
    <p><strong>Attendees:</strong> David, Thomas, Torri, Naomi, Armen, Jiawei, Patrick</p>
 +
    <p><strong>Note:</strong> With the holidays approaching, some work may need to be conducted through alternative means.</p>
  
 +
    <h2>Progress Updates</h2>
 +
 +
    <h3>Thomas</h3>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li>Will run queries to retrieve data on nudges again.</li>
 +
        <li>Plans to search for relevant anecdotes in the logbook.</li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
 +
    <h3>Patrick</h3>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li>Shared slides on his investigation into backlash:
 +
            <ul>
 +
                <li>Used <strong>S2020</strong> and removed outliers.</li>
 +
                <li>Ensured the beam was operational.</li>
 +
                <li>Observed fixed roll and three groupings of yaw:
 +
                    <ul>
 +
                        <li><strong>Coherent edge spread</strong> (a few hundred MeV).</li>
 +
                        <li>Question: Where is this spread originating?</li>
 +
                    </ul>
 +
                </li>
 +
                <li>Hypothesized that variation could be <strong>fit-driven</strong>:
 +
                    <ul>
 +
                        <li>Scalar values archived:
 +
                            <ul>
 +
                                <li>Requires refitting (current fits show errors).</li>
 +
                                <li>Utilized <strong>Minuit fit</strong>.</li>
 +
                                <li>Possible hue mismatch with run number (or another factor).</li>
 +
                                <li>Need to calculate the error on the coherent edge.</li>
 +
                            </ul>
 +
                        </li>
 +
                        <li>Highlighted the <strong>difference between set point and position</strong>.</li>
 +
                    </ul>
 +
                </li>
 +
            </ul>
 +
        </li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
 +
    <h3>Naomi</h3>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li>Researched coherent peak movement instances:
 +
            <ul>
 +
                <li>Recalled the <strong>March 30, 2018 event</strong>, where the coherent edge appeared problematic:
 +
                    <ul>
 +
                        <li>A new diamond spot was located with a very narrow width.</li>
 +
                        <li>After the accelerator resumed operation, the width increased significantly.</li>
 +
                        <li>Hovannes relocated the beam to a new position for stability.</li>
 +
                    </ul>
 +
                </li>
 +
                <li>Plans to examine CPP logs for periods with significant beam movement.</li>
 +
            </ul>
 +
        </li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
 +
    <h3>Jiawei</h3>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li>Presented <strong>before-and-after plots</strong> of coherent peak changes using archived data:
 +
            <ul>
 +
                <li>Data source: <strong>HD:CBREM:ENH_REF</strong>.</li>
 +
                <li>While the reference plot appears static, it successfully illustrates the difference in coherence.</li>
 +
                <li>Mentioned that a <strong>“live plot” is harder</strong> to implement but feasible.</li>
 +
            </ul>
 +
        </li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
 +
    <h2>Action Items</h2>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li><strong>Thomas:</strong> Follow up on nudge data and search for relevant logbook entries.</li>
 +
        <li><strong>Naomi:</strong> Continue analysis in CPP logs for beam movement.</li>
 +
        <li><strong>Patrick:</strong> Refine Minuit fit and further explore causes of variation in coherent edge spread.</li>
 +
        <li><strong>Jiawei:</strong> Investigate feasibility of implementing a live plot for coherent edge monitoring.</li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
</body>
 +
</html>
  
 
=== Action Items===
 
=== Action Items===

Revision as of 19:10, 18 November 2024

The current weekly meeting time is every other Monday at 13:00 US/Eastern

Connection Info:

You can connect using ZOOM Video conferencing (ID: 161 588 8669). (Click "Expand" to the right for details -->):

One tap mobile: US: +16692545252,,1602484178# or +16468287666,,1602484178#

Meeting URL: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1615888669?pwd=MnhGVUhpeEd3NVpnTGxoZHJManNBdz09&from=addon
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
Passcode: 561441

Join by Telephone
For higher quality, dial a number based on your current location.
Dial: +1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose)
+1 646 828 7666 US (New York)
+1 646 964 1167 US (US Spanish Line)
+1 551 285 1373 US (New Jersey)
+1 669 216 1590 US (San Jose)
+1 415 449 4000 US (US Spanish Line)
833 568 8864 US Toll-free
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
International numbers
Join from an H.323/SIP room system
H.323: 161.199.138.10 (US West)
161.199.136.10 (US East)
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
Passcode: 561441

SIP: 1615888669@sip.zoomgov.com
Passcode: 561441

One tap mobile: US: +16692545252,,1601987443# or +16468287666,,1601987443#

Meeting URL: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1615888669?pwd=MnhGVUhpeEd3NVpnTGxoZHJManNBdz09&from=addon
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
Passcode: 561441

AIOP - Polarized Photon Source

Agenda:

  1. Previous Meeting
  2. Announcements
  3. Conferences/Workshops
  4. Project Progress
  5. PIER Activities
    • Middle School Data Science Hackathon Workshop (Oct. 16) Flappy Bird RL Learning - COMPLETED!
    • HUGS mini-Workshop - COMPLETED!
  6. AOT




Minutes

<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head>

   <meta charset="UTF-8">
   <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
   <title>AIOP Meeting Notes - 11/18/24</title>

</head> <body>

AIOP Meeting Notes - 11/18/24

Attendees: David, Thomas, Torri, Naomi, Armen, Jiawei, Patrick

Note: With the holidays approaching, some work may need to be conducted through alternative means.

Progress Updates

Thomas

  • Will run queries to retrieve data on nudges again.
  • Plans to search for relevant anecdotes in the logbook.

Patrick

  • Shared slides on his investigation into backlash:
    • Used S2020 and removed outliers.
    • Ensured the beam was operational.
    • Observed fixed roll and three groupings of yaw:
      • Coherent edge spread (a few hundred MeV).
      • Question: Where is this spread originating?
    • Hypothesized that variation could be fit-driven:
      • Scalar values archived:
        • Requires refitting (current fits show errors).
        • Utilized Minuit fit.
        • Possible hue mismatch with run number (or another factor).
        • Need to calculate the error on the coherent edge.
      • Highlighted the difference between set point and position.

Naomi

  • Researched coherent peak movement instances:
    • Recalled the March 30, 2018 event, where the coherent edge appeared problematic:
      • A new diamond spot was located with a very narrow width.
      • After the accelerator resumed operation, the width increased significantly.
      • Hovannes relocated the beam to a new position for stability.
    • Plans to examine CPP logs for periods with significant beam movement.

Jiawei

  • Presented before-and-after plots of coherent peak changes using archived data:
    • Data source: HD:CBREM:ENH_REF.
    • While the reference plot appears static, it successfully illustrates the difference in coherence.
    • Mentioned that a “live plot” is harder to implement but feasible.

Action Items

  • Thomas: Follow up on nudge data and search for relevant logbook entries.
  • Naomi: Continue analysis in CPP logs for beam movement.
  • Patrick: Refine Minuit fit and further explore causes of variation in coherent edge spread.
  • Jiawei: Investigate feasibility of implementing a live plot for coherent edge monitoring.

</body> </html>

Action Items

Milestones!