Difference between revisions of "AIOP Dec. 16, 2024"
| Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
| − | <strong>Todo</strong>: Take all nudge events, shuffle, take the first 10. Use that time with a +/- <span style="color: red;">5 min</span> (or 10 min) window and make the Naomi plots. | + | <strong>Todo</strong>: Take all nudge events, shuffle, take the first 10. Use that time with a +/- <span style="color: red;">5 min</span> (or 10 min) window and make the Naomi plots. Plots could be semi-automated using a cnf file for myaplot (or writing the url for the wave gui). |
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
Naomi suggested maybe using PS pair energy instead of the microscope. It has slower rates and would need reconstruction, but the recon is minimal, could probably be sped up. Advantages of PS Pair E: not dependent on amo normalization. Possibly (need to check) less susceptible to sudden gain changes which demand another amo-reference. At the least, we could compare a fit to the PS pair E edge with the microscope fit result and look for changes in the difference, if that changes then we need a new amo reference. That's the theory. </li> | Naomi suggested maybe using PS pair energy instead of the microscope. It has slower rates and would need reconstruction, but the recon is minimal, could probably be sped up. Advantages of PS Pair E: not dependent on amo normalization. Possibly (need to check) less susceptible to sudden gain changes which demand another amo-reference. At the least, we could compare a fit to the PS pair E edge with the microscope fit result and look for changes in the difference, if that changes then we need a new amo reference. That's the theory. </li> | ||
| − | <li>We all noted that permitting a diamond spectrum to be stored as an amorphous reference is | + | <li>We all noted that permitting a diamond spectrum to be stored as an amorphous reference is very trusting of the user, but probably Hovanes fixed that. |
</li> | </li> | ||
| + | <li> At some point Mark improved the edge fitting routing. We might want to write our own one and refit the microscope data. | ||
| + | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:38, 16 December 2024
The current weekly meeting time is every other Monday at 13:00 US/Eastern
Connection Info:
You can connect using ZOOM Video conferencing (ID: 161 588 8669). (Click "Expand" to the right for details -->):
One tap mobile: US: +16692545252,,1602484178# or +16468287666,,1602484178#
Meeting URL: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1615888669?pwd=MnhGVUhpeEd3NVpnTGxoZHJManNBdz09&from=addon
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
Passcode: 561441
Join by Telephone
For higher quality, dial a number based on your current location.
Dial: +1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose)
+1 646 828 7666 US (New York)
+1 646 964 1167 US (US Spanish Line)
+1 551 285 1373 US (New Jersey)
+1 669 216 1590 US (San Jose)
+1 415 449 4000 US (US Spanish Line)
833 568 8864 US Toll-free
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
International numbers
Join from an H.323/SIP room system
H.323: 161.199.138.10 (US West)
161.199.136.10 (US East)
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
Passcode: 561441
SIP: 1615888669@sip.zoomgov.com
Passcode: 561441
One tap mobile: US: +16692545252,,1601987443# or +16468287666,,1601987443#
Meeting URL: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1615888669?pwd=MnhGVUhpeEd3NVpnTGxoZHJManNBdz09&from=addon
Meeting ID: 161 588 8669
Passcode: 561441
AIOP - Polarized Photon Source
Agenda:
- Previous Meeting
- Announcements
- Conferences/Workshops
- NP AI PI Exchange Meeting (Dec. 4-5 Washington D.C.)(David, Thomas, Naomi)
- Project Progress
- Coherent peak drift evidence
- GitHub AIOP Project (AIOP-Photon issues)
- Milestones: PDF(GitHub AIOP Project AIOP-Photon issues FTE Profiles)
- PIER Activities
Middle School Data Science Hackathon Workshop (Oct. 16) Flappy Bird RL Learning- COMPLETED!HUGS mini-Workshop- COMPLETED!
- AOT
Minutes
AIOP Source 11-18-24
Attendees
David, Thomas, Torri, Naomi, Jiawei, Armen
Jiawei Waymo internship: 3 months over summer. Will resume this work after.
Progress
-
Jiawei looked into specific nudge events
- 4 examples
-
2018-03-29/30: Beam spot change
- Unknown why the beam spot was changed
- Before and after scalar ratio values are different... maybe the AMO had different beam current but not updated. Maybe fitter issues
- 2018-03-05: Long accel down
- Run 71350/71351: David failed to restore spectrum
-
2022-06-25: Cristiano nudge
- Mysteries abound: no 3 plateaus in beam position. Spectrum looks odd. Seems that there were 3 nudges and the edge dropped 60 MeV
- We looked at Naomi’s nudge and there seems like little correlation before 12:18 but seems like strong PITCH to edge correlation
-
2018-03-29/30: Beam spot change
- Todo: Take all nudge events, shuffle, take the first 10. Use that time with a +/- 5 min (or 10 min) window and make the Naomi plots. Plots could be semi-automated using a cnf file for myaplot (or writing the url for the wave gui).
- 4 examples
- Naomi suggested maybe using PS pair energy instead of the microscope. It has slower rates and would need reconstruction, but the recon is minimal, could probably be sped up. Advantages of PS Pair E: not dependent on amo normalization. Possibly (need to check) less susceptible to sudden gain changes which demand another amo-reference. At the least, we could compare a fit to the PS pair E edge with the microscope fit result and look for changes in the difference, if that changes then we need a new amo reference. That's the theory.
- We all noted that permitting a diamond spectrum to be stored as an amorphous reference is very trusting of the user, but probably Hovanes fixed that.
- At some point Mark improved the edge fitting routing. We might want to write our own one and refit the microscope data.