Difference between revisions of "The HPS Run Wiki"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
Beam width in any direction should not depend on the harp scan speed, any dependence will indicate beam position oscilation | Beam width in any direction should not depend on the harp scan speed, any dependence will indicate beam position oscilation | ||
− | * If beam position (mean values of fitted peaks) are stable with <0.1 mm, proceed with the program, otherwise work with MCC to stabilize the beam | + | * If beam position (mean values of fitted peaks) are stable with <0.1 mm, and the widths are independent of the scan speed, proceed with the program, otherwise work with MCC to stabilize the beam |
* Study beam tails as a function of current - perform tagger harp scans with different harp setting at 10nA, 20nA, 50nA, 100nA: | * Study beam tails as a function of current - perform tagger harp scans with different harp setting at 10nA, 20nA, 50nA, 100nA: | ||
** nominal setting - "Speed during scan" = 0.5 and "Time between scaler reads" = 0.07 | ** nominal setting - "Speed during scan" = 0.5 and "Time between scaler reads" = 0.07 |
Revision as of 10:05, 14 March 2015
[edit]
Important Phone NumbersShift ScheduleChecklists |
Procedures |
Manuals |
JLab Logbooks
|
RC: Stepan Stepanyan
PDL: Harut AvagyanEvery Shift:
SVT InstructionsBefore sending beam to Faraday cup, verify (and page expert if otherwise):
The first time sending beam to the Faraday cup after the hall is closed, page the SVT expert. Every Run:
|
Run Plan:March 13-14 (morning)Setup Beam to Hall-B Tagger Dump and Studies of Beam Properties.
Beam width in any direction should not depend on the harp scan speed, any dependence will indicate beam position oscilation
Harp settings can be changed on the GUI by typing new values in the window For harps analysis use upstream left
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|