Difference between revisions of "April 25th, 2023"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <b>Attended</b>: ''Moskov'' ... and '' | + | <b>Attended</b>: ''Moskov'', ''Mikhail'', ''Jim'', ''Sean'', ''Eugene'', ''Hovanes'', and ''Igor''. Yesterday evening, ''Justin'' broke his collarbone on a bike ride. |
| + | |||
| + | * ''Eugene'' said that ''Patricia'' is scheduled for an ERR-I meeting in the first week of Aust, 2023. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * ''Moskov'' and ''Jim'' suggested the next 7th KLF Collaboration meeting as an International Conference for 3 days in September, 2023. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * ''Sean'' promised to polish KPT manuscript in a week or so. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * ''Mikhail'' promised to recover KFM monitor soon. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * On April 21th, ''Tanja Horn'' had a ''CPS'' meeting (main focus is CPS for Hall C) [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/index.php/Meeting_21_April_2023]. | ||
| + | :* [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/8/80/CPS-April-221-2023.pdf Engineering Status Report] (''Steven Lassiter'') | ||
| + | :* [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/a/a5/Hall_C_CPS_4-21-23.pdf Mechanical Support and Layout] | ||
| + | :* [https://userweb.jlab.org/~pavel/projects/CPS_HC/March09/CPS_HC-Apr2023.pdf CPS FLUKA Model Update] (''Pavel'') | ||
| + | :* Hall D has a chance to get a portion of 40 t lead from SLAC depending on Hall C. | ||
| + | :* ''Donal's'' questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | My concerns will be assuaged if a we had a radiation dose prediction of the target after a month of running with an electron beam of 90 na. No CPS and a pure electron beam. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I’d like to compare the case presented by Pavel today with one where the beam energy and target details are unchanged but instead of a photon beam on the target, | ||
| + | the study would assume an electron beam of 90 na. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In other words, I’d like to compare what MIGHT be real-world conditions (with the CPS) with what would represent the conditions we have actually had in the past. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I might have asked for something that leaves us open to criticism that we are comparing apples to oranges. | ||
* On April 17th, we had a ''Hovanes'' CPS meeting discuss CPS design for Hall D and to prepare for ERR-I [https://wiki.jlab.org/klproject/index.php/CPS_meeting_-_April_17,_2023]. | * On April 17th, we had a ''Hovanes'' CPS meeting discuss CPS design for Hall D and to prepare for ERR-I [https://wiki.jlab.org/klproject/index.php/CPS_meeting_-_April_17,_2023]. | ||
| − | :* | + | :* [[media:status_report_04_17_2023.pdf | Status update]] (''Hovanes'') |
| − | :* Updates on magnet | + | :* [[media:core_temp_mathematica_04_17_2023.pdf | CPS core temperature calculations from Poisson's equation]] (''Hovanes'') |
| + | :* Two-magnet model with lead (''Vitaly'') | ||
| + | :* Updates on the single-magnet CPS model (''Pavel'' - no news) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:54, 25 April 2023
Attended: Moskov, Mikhail, Jim, Sean, Eugene, Hovanes, and Igor. Yesterday evening, Justin broke his collarbone on a bike ride.
- Eugene said that Patricia is scheduled for an ERR-I meeting in the first week of Aust, 2023.
- Moskov and Jim suggested the next 7th KLF Collaboration meeting as an International Conference for 3 days in September, 2023.
- Sean promised to polish KPT manuscript in a week or so.
- Mikhail promised to recover KFM monitor soon.
- On April 21th, Tanja Horn had a CPS meeting (main focus is CPS for Hall C) [1].
- Engineering Status Report (Steven Lassiter)
- Mechanical Support and Layout
- CPS FLUKA Model Update (Pavel)
- Hall D has a chance to get a portion of 40 t lead from SLAC depending on Hall C.
- Donal's questions:
My concerns will be assuaged if a we had a radiation dose prediction of the target after a month of running with an electron beam of 90 na. No CPS and a pure electron beam.
I’d like to compare the case presented by Pavel today with one where the beam energy and target details are unchanged but instead of a photon beam on the target, the study would assume an electron beam of 90 na.
In other words, I’d like to compare what MIGHT be real-world conditions (with the CPS) with what would represent the conditions we have actually had in the past.
I might have asked for something that leaves us open to criticism that we are comparing apples to oranges.
- On April 17th, we had a Hovanes CPS meeting discuss CPS design for Hall D and to prepare for ERR-I [2].
- Status update (Hovanes)
- CPS core temperature calculations from Poisson's equation (Hovanes)
- Two-magnet model with lead (Vitaly)
- Updates on the single-magnet CPS model (Pavel - no news)