Difference between revisions of "July 28th, 2023"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <b>Attended</b>: ''Moskov'', ''Justin'', ''Mikhail'', ''Eugene'', ''Hovanes'', ''Vitaly'', ''Pavel'', ''Riad'', ''Edy'', ''Igor'', ''Sean'' (after | + | <b>Attended</b>: ''Moskov'', ''Justin'', ''Mikhail'', ''Eugene'', ''Hovanes'', ''Tim'', ''Vitaly'', ''Pavel'', ''Riad'', ''Edy'', ''Igor'', ''Sean'' (after 9:00 am). ''Jeoff'' is traveling. |
* On Aug 2nd, ERR-I is sceduled. All details are in [https://wiki.jlab.org/klproject/index.php/KLF_Phase_I_ERR]. | * On Aug 2nd, ERR-I is sceduled. All details are in [https://wiki.jlab.org/klproject/index.php/KLF_Phase_I_ERR]. | ||
Revision as of 08:01, 28 July 2023
Attended: Moskov, Justin, Mikhail, Eugene, Hovanes, Tim, Vitaly, Pavel, Riad, Edy, Igor, Sean (after 9:00 am). Jeoff is traveling.
- On Aug 2nd, ERR-I is sceduled. All details are in [1].
- All three documents are ready for the review. 5 of 10 slides are ready for the review as well.
- On July 25th, we had a Marco muBDX@KLF/CPS meeting disciss the following...
- Tonino gave a short presentation about the work he did in the old configuration and the integration in the new.
- We discussed:
- Options to move upstream the whole CPS.
- Options to deflect 0.5 GeV - 5 GeV muons on one side of the beamline:
- Options to shield the detector set up:
- 1) Increasing the permanent magnet Bdl or
- 2) Switching from a pure permanent to a permanent/powerd magnet
- 3) Adding a further magnet downstream.
- Weight, available clearance, of the two dipoles necessary to determine incoming/scattered muon momentum.
- Other possible issues.
- Coordination with KLF Coll and Hall-D team.
- On July 24th, we had a Hovanes CPS meeting discuss CPS design for Hall D and to prepare for ERR-I [2].
- Thermal analysis of the CPS absorber in ANSYS (Tim)
- CPS presentation at ERR-1 (Hovanes)
- CPS technical note (Hovanes, Pavel)