Difference between revisions of "November 19th, 2024"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* Talks | * Talks | ||
* Vitaly Baturin | * Vitaly Baturin | ||
| − | [[media:KLFSOFTMeeting111924.pdf | "Reaction Filter Reconstruction of | + | [[media:KLFSOFTMeeting111924.pdf | "Reaction Filter Reconstruction of Kl+p → Ks + p at Kl Momentum =(0.23;0.65) GeV/c"]] |
* <b>Notes</b> | * <b>Notes</b> | ||
* Had some discussion about Vitaly's and Sashi's analyses. Sean pointed out that they were probably not using the right ReactionFilter options, will help dig into this. | * Had some discussion about Vitaly's and Sashi's analyses. Sean pointed out that they were probably not using the right ReactionFilter options, will help dig into this. | ||
* Extensive discussion on validating photoproduction cross section expectations from PYTHIA. Richard showed some results from phi production at RadPhi, which had large errors, but agreed with Eugene's calculations on the roughly 20% level. Came to the conclusion that it should be possible to check the p+Ks photoproduction cross section at GlueX. Sean has some code that can be adapted to look into this, and offered to do so. | * Extensive discussion on validating photoproduction cross section expectations from PYTHIA. Richard showed some results from phi production at RadPhi, which had large errors, but agreed with Eugene's calculations on the roughly 20% level. Came to the conclusion that it should be possible to check the p+Ks photoproduction cross section at GlueX. Sean has some code that can be adapted to look into this, and offered to do so. | ||
Revision as of 09:48, 3 December 2024
Attended:
- Announcements
- KLF Intermediate ERR Final Report
- KLF Software Task List.
- Talks
- Vitaly Baturin
"Reaction Filter Reconstruction of Kl+p → Ks + p at Kl Momentum =(0.23;0.65) GeV/c"
- Notes
- Had some discussion about Vitaly's and Sashi's analyses. Sean pointed out that they were probably not using the right ReactionFilter options, will help dig into this.
- Extensive discussion on validating photoproduction cross section expectations from PYTHIA. Richard showed some results from phi production at RadPhi, which had large errors, but agreed with Eugene's calculations on the roughly 20% level. Came to the conclusion that it should be possible to check the p+Ks photoproduction cross section at GlueX. Sean has some code that can be adapted to look into this, and offered to do so.