Difference between revisions of "GTS meeting 8 14 17"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* YAG facts: [[media:YAG_facts.docx]] | * YAG facts: [[media:YAG_facts.docx]] | ||
| − | + | At GTS, we have: YAG:Ce, both sides polished, dimensions: dia. 50.8 x 0.1 mm, AR coating centered at 550 nm on both sides, reflectivity 0.5 % at 500-600 nm, <1 % at 470-670 nm. | |
* ASTRA Simulation - Sajini: | * ASTRA Simulation - Sajini: | ||
| − | :: | + | :: Solutions to the Reiser's equation for the new magnetic field map: [[media:Mismatch_oscillation_plots_for_new_field_map_14August2017.xlsx]] |
| + | :: ASTRA simulations for the new magnetic field, the x_rms vs z and x_avg vs z plots (beam is nearly off by 5mm): [[media:300kV_0_106mm_xyoff_new_field_map_8_7_x_rms_vs_I_14August2017.xlsx]] | ||
Latest revision as of 08:25, 14 August 2017
- Emittance Measurements - Yan
- YAG facts: media:YAG_facts.docx
At GTS, we have: YAG:Ce, both sides polished, dimensions: dia. 50.8 x 0.1 mm, AR coating centered at 550 nm on both sides, reflectivity 0.5 % at 500-600 nm, <1 % at 470-670 nm.
- ASTRA Simulation - Sajini:
- Solutions to the Reiser's equation for the new magnetic field map: media:Mismatch_oscillation_plots_for_new_field_map_14August2017.xlsx
- ASTRA simulations for the new magnetic field, the x_rms vs z and x_avg vs z plots (beam is nearly off by 5mm): media:300kV_0_106mm_xyoff_new_field_map_8_7_x_rms_vs_I_14August2017.xlsx