Difference between revisions of "QW Wien quadrupoles (200 kV upgrade)"

From Ciswikidb
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
New Wien quadrupoles have been designed to operate at higher 200 kV energy but also with improved magnetic and mechanical design.
 
New Wien quadrupoles have been designed to operate at higher 200 kV energy but also with improved magnetic and mechanical design.
 +
 +
== What to consider in a new design? ==
 +
; Requirements
 +
* Larger ID air-core quad that could fit over 2-3/4" flange
 +
* Longer quad to provide more field strength (required values under study; appears we need at least 33% increase over existing QW @ 3A)
 +
* Quads have to be bakeable to 250C; as they're still captured when vacuum assembly made-up before beam line bake out
 +
* Operate w/ <10 A idea, so can use existing trim cards (like those presently used)
 +
 +
; Darmstadt triplet
 +
:B. Steiner et al., Recent Simulation Results of the Polarized Electron injector (SPIN) of the S-DALINAC [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228564835_Recent_Simulation_Results_of_the_Polarized_Electron_injector_SPIN_of_the_S-DALINAC] ([[media:200204_Triplet.pdf]])
 +
:J. Benesch, Modeling the Darmstadt quad triplet [https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-200405/JLAB-TN-19-025.pdf JLAB-TN-19-025]
 +
 +
== New Design ==
  
 
; Design studies
 
; Design studies
Line 5: Line 18:
 
* Lakshmi's slides from Aug 31, 2020 design meeting [[media:QW Magnet design-V02-Lakshmi-20200831.pdf]]
 
* Lakshmi's slides from Aug 31, 2020 design meeting [[media:QW Magnet design-V02-Lakshmi-20200831.pdf]]
 
* Lakshmi's slides from Aug 20, 2020 design meeting [[media:QW Magnet design-V01-Lakshmi-20200819.pdf]]
 
* Lakshmi's slides from Aug 20, 2020 design meeting [[media:QW Magnet design-V01-Lakshmi-20200819.pdf]]
 +
 +
; Final design report
 +
* EM design [https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-246401/21-024.pdf JLAB-TN-21-024]
 +
 +
; Drawings
 +
* Wien crosses - [[media:JL0091130-0222-03, QW 6-way cross sketch for quote-1.pdf]]
  
 
; Performance
 
; Performance
 +
* Measurement (magnetic, thermal, resistance, inductive) vs. Design [https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-246694/21-025.pdf JLAB-TN-21-025]
  
 +
== Pre-existing QW's ==
 
; Background
 
; Background
 
* These quads are used to compensate the dipole focusing of the Wien filters.
 
* These quads are used to compensate the dipole focusing of the Wien filters.
Line 15: Line 36:
 
* Their length is about 4.9", the length of the 6-way cross.  They could be longer, however, the 6-way cross abuts an 8" zero-reducer flange on the Wien filter, so a longer coil could not be perfectly symmetric on the 6-way cross.  But, that's OK.  A great way to recover field strength, I guess.
 
* Their length is about 4.9", the length of the 6-way cross.  They could be longer, however, the 6-way cross abuts an 8" zero-reducer flange on the Wien filter, so a longer coil could not be perfectly symmetric on the 6-way cross.  But, that's OK.  A great way to recover field strength, I guess.
  
−
; Pre-existing drawings
+
; Engineering Drawings
 
* Assembly drawing [[media:ACC2004000-1035 - QW QUAD-CROSS ASSEMBLY.pdf]]
 
* Assembly drawing [[media:ACC2004000-1035 - QW QUAD-CROSS ASSEMBLY.pdf]]
 
* Coil drawing [[media:QW_magnet.pdf]]
 
* Coil drawing [[media:QW_magnet.pdf]]
Line 28: Line 49:
 
  > dipole, 22.57 G, both evaluated at 1 cm radius.  With 1 A and 36 T,  
 
  > dipole, 22.57 G, both evaluated at 1 cm radius.  With 1 A and 36 T,  
 
  > 23.21 G quadrupole at 1 cm radius.
 
  > 23.21 G quadrupole at 1 cm radius.
−
 
−
; What to consider in a new design?
 
−
* Larger ID air-core quad that could fit over 2-3/4" flange
 
−
* Longer quad to provide more field strength (required values under study; appears we need at least 33% increase over existing QW @ 3A)
 
−
* Quads have to be bakeable to 250C; as they're still captured when vacuum assembly made-up before beam line bake out
 
−
* Operate w/ <10 A idea, so can use existing trim cards (like those presently used)
 
−
 
−
; Darmstadt triplet
 
−
:B. Steiner et al., Recent Simulation Results of the Polarized Electron injector (SPIN) of the S-DALINAC [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228564835_Recent_Simulation_Results_of_the_Polarized_Electron_injector_SPIN_of_the_S-DALINAC] ([[media:200204_Triplet.pdf]])
 
−
:J. Benesch, Modeling the Darmstadt quad triplet [https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-200405/JLAB-TN-19-025.pdf JLAB-TN-19-025]
 

Latest revision as of 12:21, 8 September 2021

New Wien quadrupoles have been designed to operate at higher 200 kV energy but also with improved magnetic and mechanical design.

What to consider in a new design?

Requirements
  • Larger ID air-core quad that could fit over 2-3/4" flange
  • Longer quad to provide more field strength (required values under study; appears we need at least 33% increase over existing QW @ 3A)
  • Quads have to be bakeable to 250C; as they're still captured when vacuum assembly made-up before beam line bake out
  • Operate w/ <10 A idea, so can use existing trim cards (like those presently used)
Darmstadt triplet
B. Steiner et al., Recent Simulation Results of the Polarized Electron injector (SPIN) of the S-DALINAC [1] (media:200204_Triplet.pdf)
J. Benesch, Modeling the Darmstadt quad triplet JLAB-TN-19-025

New Design

Design studies
Final design report
Drawings
Performance
  • Measurement (magnetic, thermal, resistance, inductive) vs. Design JLAB-TN-21-025

Pre-existing QW's

Background
  • These quads are used to compensate the dipole focusing of the Wien filters.
  • There is one installed on the 6-way cross upstream/downstream of each Wien filter.
  • They were designed to fit on top of existing 6-way viewer cross (1.5" pipe w/ 2-3/4" flanges).
  • In order to maximize the field strength they were designed w/ as small an ID as possible 2-3/4". However, this means they're captured by the flanges which are welded on after the coils are assembled. We'd love to eliminate this, to have a quad coil that would pass over the 2-3/4" flange.
  • Their length is about 4.9", the length of the 6-way cross. They could be longer, however, the 6-way cross abuts an 8" zero-reducer flange on the Wien filter, so a longer coil could not be perfectly symmetric on the 6-way cross. But, that's OK. A great way to recover field strength, I guess.
Engineering Drawings
QW info
  • Present operating limit is 3A
  • Field measurements may exist, need to look
  • Jay should have a model of the quads, a good starting place, here's info from him:
On 3/5/2020 2:42 PM, Jay Benesch wrote:
> IR of QW model 1.375".  Cross section 0.3" radial by 0.22" azimuthal. 
> 4.92" overall length.  35 AT in my 1A model, not 36 T.  0.55 G-cm 
> dipole, 22.57 G, both evaluated at 1 cm radius.  With 1 A and 36 T, 
> 23.21 G quadrupole at 1 cm radius.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.jlab.org/ciswiki/index.php?title=QW_Wien_quadrupoles_(200_kV_upgrade)&oldid=26061"