Difference between revisions of "QW Wien quadrupoles (200 kV upgrade)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
New Wien quadrupoles have been designed to operate at higher 200 kV energy but also with improved magnetic and mechanical design. | New Wien quadrupoles have been designed to operate at higher 200 kV energy but also with improved magnetic and mechanical design. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == What to consider in a new design? == | ||
| + | ; Requirements | ||
| + | * Larger ID air-core quad that could fit over 2-3/4" flange | ||
| + | * Longer quad to provide more field strength (required values under study; appears we need at least 33% increase over existing QW @ 3A) | ||
| + | * Quads have to be bakeable to 250C; as they're still captured when vacuum assembly made-up before beam line bake out | ||
| + | * Operate w/ <10 A idea, so can use existing trim cards (like those presently used) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ; Darmstadt triplet | ||
| + | :B. Steiner et al., Recent Simulation Results of the Polarized Electron injector (SPIN) of the S-DALINAC [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228564835_Recent_Simulation_Results_of_the_Polarized_Electron_injector_SPIN_of_the_S-DALINAC] ([[media:200204_Triplet.pdf]]) | ||
| + | :J. Benesch, Modeling the Darmstadt quad triplet [https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-200405/JLAB-TN-19-025.pdf JLAB-TN-19-025] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == New Design == | ||
; Design studies | ; Design studies | ||
| Line 5: | Line 18: | ||
* Lakshmi's slides from Aug 31, 2020 design meeting [[media:QW Magnet design-V02-Lakshmi-20200831.pdf]] | * Lakshmi's slides from Aug 31, 2020 design meeting [[media:QW Magnet design-V02-Lakshmi-20200831.pdf]] | ||
* Lakshmi's slides from Aug 20, 2020 design meeting [[media:QW Magnet design-V01-Lakshmi-20200819.pdf]] | * Lakshmi's slides from Aug 20, 2020 design meeting [[media:QW Magnet design-V01-Lakshmi-20200819.pdf]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ; Final design report | ||
| + | * EM design [[media:EM design-QW-V01-210520.docx]] | ||
; Drawings | ; Drawings | ||
| Line 10: | Line 26: | ||
; Performance | ; Performance | ||
| + | * Measurement vs. Design [[media:MEG0002021-R004-MQW magnetic mapping-V01-210521.dox]] | ||
| + | == Pre-existing QW's == | ||
; Background | ; Background | ||
* These quads are used to compensate the dipole focusing of the Wien filters. | * These quads are used to compensate the dipole focusing of the Wien filters. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 36: | ||
* Their length is about 4.9", the length of the 6-way cross. They could be longer, however, the 6-way cross abuts an 8" zero-reducer flange on the Wien filter, so a longer coil could not be perfectly symmetric on the 6-way cross. But, that's OK. A great way to recover field strength, I guess. | * Their length is about 4.9", the length of the 6-way cross. They could be longer, however, the 6-way cross abuts an 8" zero-reducer flange on the Wien filter, so a longer coil could not be perfectly symmetric on the 6-way cross. But, that's OK. A great way to recover field strength, I guess. | ||
| − | ; | + | ; Engineering Drawings |
* Assembly drawing [[media:ACC2004000-1035 - QW QUAD-CROSS ASSEMBLY.pdf]] | * Assembly drawing [[media:ACC2004000-1035 - QW QUAD-CROSS ASSEMBLY.pdf]] | ||
* Coil drawing [[media:QW_magnet.pdf]] | * Coil drawing [[media:QW_magnet.pdf]] | ||
| Line 31: | Line 49: | ||
> dipole, 22.57 G, both evaluated at 1 cm radius. With 1 A and 36 T, | > dipole, 22.57 G, both evaluated at 1 cm radius. With 1 A and 36 T, | ||
> 23.21 G quadrupole at 1 cm radius. | > 23.21 G quadrupole at 1 cm radius. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 16:36, 17 June 2021
New Wien quadrupoles have been designed to operate at higher 200 kV energy but also with improved magnetic and mechanical design.
What to consider in a new design?
- Requirements
- Larger ID air-core quad that could fit over 2-3/4" flange
- Longer quad to provide more field strength (required values under study; appears we need at least 33% increase over existing QW @ 3A)
- Quads have to be bakeable to 250C; as they're still captured when vacuum assembly made-up before beam line bake out
- Operate w/ <10 A idea, so can use existing trim cards (like those presently used)
- Darmstadt triplet
- B. Steiner et al., Recent Simulation Results of the Polarized Electron injector (SPIN) of the S-DALINAC [1] (media:200204_Triplet.pdf)
- J. Benesch, Modeling the Darmstadt quad triplet JLAB-TN-19-025
New Design
- Design studies
- Lakshmi's slides for Sep 17, 2020 Weekly meeting media:QW Magnet design-V03-Lakshmi-20200913.pdf
- Lakshmi's slides from Aug 31, 2020 design meeting media:QW Magnet design-V02-Lakshmi-20200831.pdf
- Lakshmi's slides from Aug 20, 2020 design meeting media:QW Magnet design-V01-Lakshmi-20200819.pdf
- Final design report
- EM design media:EM design-QW-V01-210520.docx
- Drawings
- Performance
- Measurement vs. Design media:MEG0002021-R004-MQW magnetic mapping-V01-210521.dox
Pre-existing QW's
- Background
- These quads are used to compensate the dipole focusing of the Wien filters.
- There is one installed on the 6-way cross upstream/downstream of each Wien filter.
- They were designed to fit on top of existing 6-way viewer cross (1.5" pipe w/ 2-3/4" flanges).
- In order to maximize the field strength they were designed w/ as small an ID as possible 2-3/4". However, this means they're captured by the flanges which are welded on after the coils are assembled. We'd love to eliminate this, to have a quad coil that would pass over the 2-3/4" flange.
- Their length is about 4.9", the length of the 6-way cross. They could be longer, however, the 6-way cross abuts an 8" zero-reducer flange on the Wien filter, so a longer coil could not be perfectly symmetric on the 6-way cross. But, that's OK. A great way to recover field strength, I guess.
- Engineering Drawings
- Assembly drawing media:ACC2004000-1035 - QW QUAD-CROSS ASSEMBLY.pdf
- Coil drawing media:QW_magnet.pdf
- QW info
- Present operating limit is 3A
- Field measurements may exist, need to look
- Jay should have a model of the quads, a good starting place, here's info from him:
On 3/5/2020 2:42 PM, Jay Benesch wrote: > IR of QW model 1.375". Cross section 0.3" radial by 0.22" azimuthal. > 4.92" overall length. 35 AT in my 1A model, not 36 T. 0.55 G-cm > dipole, 22.57 G, both evaluated at 1 cm radius. With 1 A and 36 T, > 23.21 G quadrupole at 1 cm radius.