Difference between revisions of "Wednesday July 24, 2013"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Re-evaluate radiator cooling | Re-evaluate radiator cooling | ||
What is the temperature of the LCW that will be used to cool the radiator? | What is the temperature of the LCW that will be used to cool the radiator? | ||
+ | What is the minimum allowed spot size on radiator. Do we need a raster? Typical sizes are about 1-2 mm sigma | ||
- On the radiator ladder, we should have a viewer and preferable a YAG viewer to check the beam size | - On the radiator ladder, we should have a viewer and preferable a YAG viewer to check the beam size | ||
- Need a camera to look at the OTR light coming from the radiator | - Need a camera to look at the OTR light coming from the radiator | ||
Line 45: | Line 46: | ||
- Electron dump must be of pure copper, contaminants must have high photo-neutron threshold (>8.5 MeV) | - Electron dump must be of pure copper, contaminants must have high photo-neutron threshold (>8.5 MeV) | ||
- Photon dump must be of pure 1100 aluminum | - Photon dump must be of pure 1100 aluminum | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Beam Energy: | ||
+ | - Goal: Absolute beam energy uncertainty of 0.1% | ||
+ | - Need new dipole with better field uniformity | ||
+ | - New power supply. What are specs on this supply? Must have an EPICS driver | ||
+ | - Put mu metal on all beam pipes | ||
* Safety: | * Safety: | ||
Line 62: | Line 69: | ||
* There is a possibility of a HIgS run next Spring | * There is a possibility of a HIgS run next Spring | ||
+ | * Need Bubble Chamber budget estimate: procurement and labor | ||
* We will meet every two weeks on Wednesdays at 3:00 to 5:00 EST | * We will meet every two weeks on Wednesdays at 3:00 to 5:00 EST | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Running at FEL pros and cons? | ||
+ | Pros: | ||
+ | - No other users | ||
+ | - 9.5 MeV Injector (with field emission) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Cons: | ||
+ | - completely new beam line |
Revision as of 10:06, 1 August 2013
We will meet in TED 2561B on Wednesday July 24 at 3:00 pm EST.
For those calling in we'll use the ReadyTalk audio conference system.
1. Dial Toll-Free Number: 866-740-1260 (U.S. & Canada) 2. Enter 7-digit access code 4402297, followed by “#”
Agenda:
media:Meeting_24July_2013.pdf media:Meeting_24July_2013.pptx
1- Schedule
2- Design of beamline, radiator and dump
- Experiment beam line today is presently decommissioned, ready for modification:
3- Bubble Chamber work at Argonne
4- Background and simulation
5- Absolute beam energy
- One slide on beam momentum Media:130724_Bubble_Grames.pdf
6- Safety
Notes from this meeting:
- Radiator:
- The power deposited in the radiator for 200 uA and 8.5 MeV electron beam: For 0.02 mm radiator, average energy loss is about 24 keV, P = 4.8 W For 0.10 mm radiator, average energy loss is about 120 keV, P = 24 W Re-evaluate radiator cooling What is the temperature of the LCW that will be used to cool the radiator? What is the minimum allowed spot size on radiator. Do we need a raster? Typical sizes are about 1-2 mm sigma - On the radiator ladder, we should have a viewer and preferable a YAG viewer to check the beam size - Need a camera to look at the OTR light coming from the radiator - What is the energy distribution of the electron beam after radiator
- Beamline:
- Need a layout of the beam line. What is the location of the radiator on the beam line? - Need a HARP in the new Bubble Chamber line to measure beam profile and energy spread - Where to put the electron dump (2-ft cube footprint)? Injector floor or on the Step - Electron dump must be of pure copper, contaminants must have high photo-neutron threshold (>8.5 MeV) - Photon dump must be of pure 1100 aluminum
- Beam Energy:
- Goal: Absolute beam energy uncertainty of 0.1% - Need new dipole with better field uniformity - New power supply. What are specs on this supply? Must have an EPICS driver - Put mu metal on all beam pipes
- Safety:
- The sweep dipole must be in FSD to protect the exit window - there will be about 500 ml of mercury used a buffer liquid in the chamber
- Simulation and Backgrounds:
- Send Claudio the GEANT4 photon spectra - Consider the beam energy spread in Penfold-liess unfolding
- Infrastructure:
- The chamber weighs about 600 lb and comes with a compressor (3.5 ft by 3.5 ft footprint), a chiller (10 C) and an electronics rack - What is the clearance between the wall and the Laser Room in the Injector? - Need 208 VAC outlet - Need a layout of the compressor and electronics platforms
- There is a possibility of a HIgS run next Spring
- Need Bubble Chamber budget estimate: procurement and labor
- We will meet every two weeks on Wednesdays at 3:00 to 5:00 EST
- Running at FEL pros and cons?
Pros: - No other users - 9.5 MeV Injector (with field emission) Cons: - completely new beam line